Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Petr Machata
Josh Boyer writes: > We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user > knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still. There's a check box to this effect in ABRT. It's not much different from sending backtraces or some other things that ABRT

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Marek Polacek
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:19:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > > > > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file > > > is not exactly fun. > > > > > > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out >

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file > > is not exactly fun. > > > > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out > > files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as >

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Peter Robinson
> Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file > is not exactly fun. > > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out > files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as > , but suc

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: >> >> > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it >> > happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Marek Polacek
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:56:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: > > > > > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it > > > happens in the buildroot which I don't think

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: > > > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it > > happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access to get the > > files out from. > > I've been bitten by thi

Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Andrew Haley
On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it > happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access to get the > files out from. I've been bitten by this several times. We need to find a better way to handle issues like this: w