Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Sun, 2018-09-16 at 10:17 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 14-09-18 20:03, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > >

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Hi, On 14-09-18 20:03, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: According to the LICENSE file in their gi

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: > > > > According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Hi, On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licen

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: > > According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems > > to be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licensecheck -r > > later and update you

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Hi, On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licensecheck -r later and update you guys. On Mon 10 Sep, 2018, 6:08 PM Richard Shaw, mailto:hobbes1...@gmai

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On 09/11/2018 06:30 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> kernel packages yes. but kmods? >> >> This is the what I thought was unambiguous FAQ entry: >> >> "You agree not to use Copr to upload software code or other material >> (“Material”) tha

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > kernel packages yes. but kmods? > > This is the what I thought was unambiguous FAQ entry: > > "You agree not to use Copr to upload software code or other material > (“Material”) that: > ... > violates any rules or guidelines of the F

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

You can pack kmods in copr , Fedora guidelines forbid kmods , I think , because they may be extremely insecure Sent from my AndroidEm 10/09/2018 7:44 da tarde, Simo Sorce escreveu: > > On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:06 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:06 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 8:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > > > Jan Rybar wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Abhiram, > > > > > > > > you can make COPR. No one asks, no harm done, everyone's happy. > > > > > > I don't think cop

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 8:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> Jan Rybar wrote: >> >> > Hi Abhiram, >> > >> > you can make COPR. No one asks, no harm done, everyone's happy. >> >> I don't think copr is appropriate either, >> https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#f

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licensecheck -r later and update you guys. On Mon 10 Sep, 2018, 6:08 PM Richard Shaw, wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Jan Rybar

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > Jan Rybar wrote: > > > Hi Abhiram, > > > > you can make COPR. No one asks, no harm done, everyone's happy. > > I don't think copr is appropriate either, > https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#faq > > To me, makes it pretty c

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 8:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > > Jan Rybar wrote: > > > Hi Abhiram, > > > > you can make COPR. No one asks, no harm done, everyone's happy. > > I don't think copr is appropriate either, > https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#faq > > To me, makes it pretty

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Jan Rybar wrote: > Hi Abhiram, > > you can make COPR. No one asks, no harm done, everyone's happy. I don't think copr is appropriate either, https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#faq To me, makes it pretty clear that if it can't be in fedora, it can't be in copr either. --

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Sure, COPR is always an option, but since this is a driver, I think it would benefit everyone if it was pushed upstream, y'know? I'm currently reading up on how to contribute to the kernel so that I can help push this. :D Any tips are welcome! On Mon 10 Sep, 2018, 1:18 PM Jan Rybar, wrote: > H

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Hi Abhiram, you can make COPR. No one asks, no harm done, everyone's happy. On 09/08/2018 02:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 8:49 AM Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: Hi all, So, the other day I ordered a USB Wireless AC adapter for my pc, and I was surprised to see that it didn't

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

Ah! Thanks for the reply! I'll do that then! On Sat 8 Sep, 2018, 6:28 PM Neal Gompa, wrote: > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 8:49 AM Abhiram Kuchibhotla > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > So, the other day I ordered a USB Wireless AC adapter for my pc, and I > was surprised to see that it didn't automaticall

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 8:49 AM Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: > > Hi all, > So, the other day I ordered a USB Wireless AC adapter for my pc, and I was > surprised to see that it didn't automatically start working. > After looking around, I came across this tutorial that mentioned this github > page.

Am I allowed to package this?

Hi all, So, the other day I ordered a USB Wireless AC adapter for my pc, and I was surprised to see that it didn't automatically start working. After looking around, I came across this tutorial that mentioned this github