Sorry for my delayed response...
On 01/28/2010 05:58 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Steve Dickson writes:
I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
when you push something out that breaks existing configurations,
Adam Williamson wrote:
There was a clear failure in this process, though, which was that the
update was sent straight to updates and did not go through
updates-testing. I can't see any reason why that should be acceptable
for an update to a very popular package which manipulates data that is
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to version 3.0.1!!!
Most of us really take pride in
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com wrote:
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
been completely
I don't usually throw in my 2p on subjective issues like this, but...
On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
Most of us really take pride in making sure what we push out to
the community has been tested and will not be disruptive
or destructive. Then there a small group of people that simply
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Alex Hudson fed...@alexhudson.com wrote:
I think it's a bit unfair to assume less than good faith on the part of
other developers.
Amen... I too use Thunderbird daily (including 3.0.1) and I have not
seen these issues either. Although it does appear that the
Dne 28.1.2010 14:17, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to
On 01/28/2010 09:45 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
Mike McGrath on 01/28/2010 08:45 AM wrote:
This one's tricky, what checks could have been in place to prevent this?
Additional testing may not have worked as some people say they aren't
seeing the issue.
It (should) be only IMAP users who are affected. Not every TB user is
using IMAP. I see
On 01/28/2010 08:29 AM, Alex Hudson wrote:
I don't usually throw in my 2p on subjective issues like this, but...
On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
Most of us really take pride in making sure what we push out to
the community has been tested and will not be disruptive
or destructive.
On 01/28/2010 08:58 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Dne 28.1.2010 14:17, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags)
Steve Dickson on 01/28/2010 09:44 AM wrote:
What is CONDSTORE support and will I have to turn it back on
once the problem has been resolved?
According to the RFC[1], it allows more efficient multi-client access
support to an IMAP server. Disabling CONDSTORE will result in more
bandwidth
Steve Dickson writes:
I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
If you need to run stable software, Fedora is not the right distro for
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Steve Dickson writes:
I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
If you
Jesse Keating writes:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Steve Dickson writes:
I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
when you push something out that breaks existing configurations,
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 19:04 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jesse Keating writes:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Steve Dickson writes:
I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard
17 matches
Mail list logo
