-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2012 05:18 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
We'll keep it around, but I'll update the wiki pages to note that
it's kinda 'dormant' for now. I'm hoping that with Bodhi 2.0
we'll be able to re-design the process and utilize
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:10 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 05:18 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
We'll keep it around, but I'll update the wiki pages to note that
it's kinda 'dormant' for now. I'm hoping that with Bodhi 2.0
we'll be able to re-design the
FESCo recently made an adjustment to the updates policy to no longer require
proventester karma for a critical path update to be deemed as stable.
Critical path updates will now require just one regular +1 karma vote during
the pre-beta phase and two regular +1 karma votes in other phases to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2012 01:19 AM, Luke Macken wrote:
FESCo recently made an adjustment to the updates policy to no
longer require proventester karma for a critical path update to be
deemed as stable.
Critical path updates will now require just one regular
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 02:58 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 01:19 AM, Luke Macken wrote:
FESCo recently made an adjustment to the updates policy to no
longer require proventester karma for a critical path update to be
deemed as stable.
Critical path updates will now
Adam Williamson wrote:
We'll keep it around, but I'll update the wiki pages to note that it's
kinda 'dormant' for now. I'm hoping that with Bodhi 2.0 we'll be able to
re-design the process and utilize proventesters in a better way.
How about just requiring 1 proventester +1 *or* 2 regular +1s
FESCo recently made an adjustment to the updates policy to no longer require
proventester karma for a critical path update to be deemed as stable.
Critical path updates will now require just one regular +1 karma vote during
the pre-beta phase and two regular +1 karma votes in other phases to be
