Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2017-01-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 10:37 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:44 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > On 08/31/2016 02:10 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > >

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2017-01-11 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:44 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> On 08/31/2016 02:10 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: >> > Hello all, >> > >> > While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some >>

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2017-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2017-01-10, Adam Williamson wrote: > Please be careful with such 'fixes'. Some specs are also built for EPEL > 6; in EPEL 6, some of these (e.g. python-argparse) are still separate > packages. > Following this rule, do not break EPEL, would effectivelly freeze

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2017-01-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:44 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 08/31/2016 02:10 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some > > packages that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's > > stdlib and

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-09-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Charalampos Stratakis wrote: >> The plan for renaming python is only for rawhide, while removing the >> Obsoletes/Provides might as well go in F25 as well, depending on the time >> frame that maintainers will be able to

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-09-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > The plan for renaming python is only for rawhide, while removing the > Obsoletes/Provides might as well go in F25 as well, depending on the time > frame that maintainers will be able to fix their packages. Why can't those simple Provides just stay in forever? I

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-09-02 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 31.8.2016 v 14:10 Charalampos Stratakis napsal(a): > glacier-cli Fixed. This was meant only for el6, but the %if was incorrectly constructed. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-09-02 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
0 PM Subject: Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python On 09/02/2016 06:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 08/31/2016 02:10 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some >>

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-09-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 09/02/2016 06:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 08/31/2016 02:10 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some >> packages that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's >> stdlib and then obsoleted

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-09-02 Thread Kalev Lember
On 08/31/2016 02:10 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > Hello all, > > While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some packages > that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's stdlib and > then obsoleted as standalone packages (thus to cope with the

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-08-31 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:10:25 PM Subject: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python Hello all, While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some packages that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's stdlib and then obsoleted as s

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-08-31 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:10:25 PM Subject: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python Hello all, While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some packages that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's stdlib and then obsoleted as s

BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

2016-08-31 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
Hello all, While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some packages that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's stdlib and then obsoleted as standalone packages (thus to cope with the change, python was obsoleting these packages and providing them as