Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 05. 20 20:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Seems reasonable to me. I'd not push it to stable releases, but seems fine to land in rawhide. Yes, I was only imagining this for rawhide. Want to work up a PR? or I guess wait for discussion a bit more. I am waiting for more discussion (particularly

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ...snip... > > Can we please have modular repos in separate package again? > > Basically revert this plus some extra comps/kickstarts changes: > >

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 05. 20 16:13, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 06. 05. 20 v 15:12 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): This has downsides: When the files are changed in next update, I won't get them updated, because they are shipped as %config(noreplace). (If they were not shipped as %config(noreplace), it would be even

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-07 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 06. 05. 20 v 15:12 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > This has downsides: When the files are changed in next update, I won't get > them updated, because they are shipped as > %config(noreplace). (If they were not shipped as %config(noreplace), it would > be even worse, as my changes would be >

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Leigh Scott
+1 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 06.05.2020 15:12, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, as a Fedora user, who doesn't consume any modules, I'd like an > easy way to disable modular repos to save some traffic (both for myself > and on the mirrors). I think this is a great idea. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Christopher
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:13 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, as a Fedora user, who doesn't consume any modules, I'd like an easy way > to disable modular repos to save some traffic (both for myself and on the > mirrors). > > Disclaimer: I do not propose to change any defaults, just the delivery

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Can we please have modular repos in separate package again? > > Basically revert this plus some extra comps/kickstarts changes: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/c/7b32bee388d093c446017f1e33309d9b96b24e15 > >

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:39 AM Dan Čermák wrote: > > Miro Hrončok writes: > > > > > Side note: It would be great if DNF supported system-repos in /usr/share and > > override options in /etc, but that is not (yet) the case. > > slightly off-topic, but I'm just going to leave libeconf (a library

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Dan Čermák
Miro Hrončok writes: > > Side note: It would be great if DNF supported system-repos in /usr/share and > override options in /etc, but that is not (yet) the case. slightly off-topic, but I'm just going to leave libeconf (a library to achieve exactly that easily) here:

Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello, as a Fedora user, who doesn't consume any modules, I'd like an easy way to disable modular repos to save some traffic (both for myself and on the mirrors). Disclaimer: I do not propose to change any defaults, just the delivery mechanism. Currently, I can do it by editing all