Re: Change in 201x-era python packaging macros?

2022-04-27 Thread Michael J Gruber
> On 26. 04. 22 17:50, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > And by unchanged spec file, you mean by updating the package to a new version > and not changing anything else, or literally by building the same package > version again? Because the rpminspect logs assume you updated it. The former: notmuch

Re: Change in 201x-era python packaging macros?

2022-04-27 Thread Miro HronĨok
On 26. 04. 22 17:50, Michael J Gruber wrote: Hi there, with an unchanged spec file, I'm getting some new errors from rpminspect now. And by unchanged spec file, you mean by updating the package to a new version and not changing anything else, or literally by building the same package

Change in 201x-era python packaging macros?

2022-04-26 Thread Michael J Gruber
Hi there, with an unchanged spec file, I'm getting some new errors from rpminspect now. That's why I'm wondering whether something has changed or I've missed a change to be followed in spec. There are two issues: Auto-generated library dependencies (f35 f36 f37):