Dne 4.6.2018 v 10:03 Jan Pazdziora napsal(a):
> In any case, it'd be nice to notify the owners of those repos to give
> them chance to review what they have and potentially rebuild their
> content on newer buildroots, or just mark their repos "alive" and
> extend the expiration for another 180
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 12:30:28PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> This means that we still have repos for fedora-18-* and epel-5-*.
>
> Is this reasonable? Or are we just wasting storage? According to our logs
> those repositories are still accessed (yes
> even that fedora-18).
It could be
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:31 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I would like to open discussion about Copr retention policy change.
>
> Right now we have:
>
> > How long do you keep the builds? ¶
>
> > We keep the last successful build from each package indefin
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you have a use case for using ancient fedoras repos? What is better for
> you: to have ancient fedora repos or to have
> more architectures in Copr?
More arches for sure.
Even if multi-arch was not a consideration, it seems like a lot
Hi,
I would like to open discussion about Copr retention policy change.
Right now we have:
> How long do you keep the builds? ¶
> We keep the last successful build from each package indefinitely. All other
> builds (old packages, failed builds) are
deleted after 14 days.
This mean
