On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 01:28:39PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> The spirit of the guidelines is to avoid using /opt and /etc/opt for
> software that fedora ships (and instead install to /usr and /etc). But
> this is a different case; Fedora doesn't ship Chrome and the package in
> question is an ex
On 05/06/2018 04:29 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Germano Massullo wrote:
Today I have received pull request [1].
Since line 62
%dir %{_sysconfdir}/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
means
/etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
and since packaging guidelines [2] say that a package
Il 05/06/18 04:29, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Germano Massullo wrote:
>>
>>> Today I have received pull request [1].
>>> Since line 62
>>> %dir %{_sysconfdir}/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
>>> means
>>> /etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
>>> and since packaging guidel
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Germano Massullo wrote:
>
>> Today I have received pull request [1].
>> Since line 62
>> %dir %{_sysconfdir}/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
>> means
>> /etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
>> and since packaging guidelines [2] say that a package may only use
>> director
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Today I have received pull request [1].
> Since line 62
> %dir %{_sysconfdir}/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
> means
> /etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
> and since packaging guidelines [2] say that a package may only use
> directories in the |/opt/fedora,|
I d
Today I have received pull request [1].
Since line 62
%dir %{_sysconfdir}/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
means
/etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/
and since packaging guidelines [2] say that a package may only use
directories in the |/opt/fedora,|
I would reject this pull request.
What do y
