On 10 May 2010 22:15, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435625#c21
> policykit doesn't allow the yum backend of PackageKit (which is running as
> root) to mount devices.
That was the case a long time ago, but that's not been true for very
many mon
/*Matthias Clasen */ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:59:56 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
root is able to mount a devic
On 10/05/10 14:28, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snip--
>
> Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
> really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
> root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or by
> running the mount comm
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
> really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
> root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or
> by running the mo
/*Frank Murphy */ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:11:13 PM +0450:
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
file is less flexible than the ability for Pack
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
> the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
> file is less flexible than the ability for PackageKit to handle media
> dynamically. Meanwhile, you c
On 05/10/2010 05:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Neither is fixing the RFE for PK, as it's notabug.
> But I firmly believe
> creting a text file, is the easier\maybe safer challenge.
>
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more
On 10/05/10 13:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>
> DVD repo is clearly not part of fedora-release at the moment. We are
> talking about the current reality. If you file a RFE and get
> fedora-release updated, then it will become easier but that is not the
> case now.
>
> Rahul
Neither is
On 05/10/2010 05:36 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> --snipp--
>
>
>> DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
>> you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
>>
> I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
> it *will* sho
On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
>
> DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
> you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
it *will* show up in default
There are manual fiddling involved
> in setting
On 05/10/2010 05:22 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 1
> How can you not click if it shows up in
> gnome-packagekit-extra?
> (admin/software/sources)
>
> Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
>
> They are on my tests.
>
> No user intervention required.
> (allow for the fact my test
On 10/05/10 12:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
>>>
>> How is it not as easy?
>>
>
> It is not a click through process.
>
> Rahul
How can you not click if it shows up in
gnome-packagekit-extra?
(admin/software/sources)
Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
They are on my
On 05/10/2010 05:06 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> --snip--
>
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
>>> Should work for F13+
>>> even for new users.
>>>
>>>
>> What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other
On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
>> Should work for F13+
>> even for new users.
>>
>
> What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository
How is it not as easy?
fedora-release*rpm
contains re
On 05/10/2010 04:48 PM, Frank Murphy wrote
> Hi Rahul,
> Check my reply from 11:04
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
> Should work for F13+
> even for new users.
>
What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository and
there is no reason it sho
On 10/05/10 12:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>> All it takes is adding method to wiki.
>> "How to use DVD\CD as repo
>>
>
> Frank,
>
> We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
> process.
It doesn't help if you insist that it can be done manually.
> Everyone
On 05/10/2010 02:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Look earlier in the thread,
> how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
>
> All it takes is adding method to wiki.
> "How to use DVD\CD as repo
>
Frank,
We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
process. It do
On 10/05/10 10:54, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
--snip--
>>
>> Look earlier in the thread,
>> how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
>
> Yes, it has. And it's more difficult that installing from the repos.
> Which was my point.
>
> Andrew.
But t
On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 10:08, Andrew Haley wrote:
> --snip--
>>
>> This is a bad argument IMO. Many users are advanced in some areas,
>> but not others. The whole idea that "Fedora is a distro for advanced
>> users therefore it should be hard to use" is absurd.
On 10/05/10 10:08, Andrew Haley wrote:
--snip--
>
> This is a bad argument IMO. Many users are advanced in some areas,
> but not others. The whole idea that "Fedora is a distro for advanced
> users therefore it should be hard to use" is absurd.
How is it hard to use? excl. patented stuff.
I c
20 matches
Mail list logo
