kinfo?taskID=48605877)
> > I'm still seeing errors like:
> >
> > /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit:
> > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned-5.4.0-5.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib64/ocaml/ppx_tools_versioned/metaquot_409/ppx.exe:
> > DWARF version 0 unhandled
> >
b/rpm/debugedit:
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned-5.4.0-5.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib64/ocaml/ppx_tools_versioned/metaquot_409/ppx.exe:
> DWARF version 0 unhandled
>
> This is with binutils 2.35-10.fc33 which AFAIK should fix this.
> [...]
> + gcc -O2 -fno-strict-al
/ppx_tools_versioned/metaquot_409/ppx.exe:
DWARF version 0 unhandled
This is with binutils 2.35-10.fc33 which AFAIK should fix this.
The ocamlopt command which generates this file is:
Running[230]: (cd _build/default && /usr/bin/ocamlopt.opt -g -o
.ppx/344604af5ef56e11f45ae295381bcce7/ppx.exe -
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:12 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:58:22PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > You might try without LTO. I'm just shooting in the dark, but LTO does
> > have a
> > significant impact on how we generate debuginfo as well as impacting the
> > structure
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:58:22PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 16:26 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Here's a bit of fallout from the mass rebuild. The alt-ergo build failed:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1548139
> [ ... ]
> You might try without
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 16:26 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Here's a bit of fallout from the mass rebuild. The alt-ergo build failed:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1548139
[ ... ]
You might try without LTO. I'm just shooting in the dark, but LTO does have a
significant
/usr/lib64/ocaml/alt-ergo/plugins/fm-simplex-plugin.cmxs:
DWARF version 0 unhandled
/usr/lib/rpm/debugedit:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/alt-ergo-2.2.0-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/bin/altgr-ergo:
DWARF version 0 unhandled
/usr/lib/rpm/debugedit:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/alt-ergo-2.2.0-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/bin/alt
