Am 08.01.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
That is kind of a basic requirement. We need to do more. We need to inform
people when their release is going EOL and we also need to automatically
prompt users to upgrade whenever there is a new release (ie) some integration
between GNOME
Dne 8.1.2015 v 12:30 Felix Schwarz napsal(a):
Am 08.01.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
That is kind of a basic requirement. We need to do more. We need to inform
people when their release is going EOL and we also need to automatically
prompt users to upgrade whenever there is a new
On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to delete
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this
week. The original description always had This COPR will be updated
until Fedora 21 has been released or until the entropy death of the
On 2015-01-07, 14:13 GMT, Pete Travis wrote:
While recognizing the massive maintenance burden of this COPR, I suspect
the majority of objections will come from the enthusiast end user type -
you know, the ones that are so eager to try the new thing they read about
that they blow right past the
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to delete
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this
week. The original description always had This COPR will be
Hi
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
/me reiterates his usual argument that we need to have a graphical fedup
front-end in Workstation to help people upgrade when it's time...
That is kind of a basic requirement. We need to do more. We need to
inform people when
On 7 January 2015 at 09:47, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2015 7:23 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com
wrote:
On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 16:15 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 16:01, Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc wrote:
While I'm not volunteeering to maintain this, I do ask - what is the reason
for deleting it vs. just leaving it around in a EOL state where it's not
being
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Matěj Cepl mc...@cepl.eu wrote:
On 2015-01-07, 14:13 GMT, Pete Travis wrote:
While recognizing the massive maintenance burden of this COPR, I suspect
the majority of objections will come from the enthusiast end user type -
you know, the ones that are so eager to
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:23:27PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to delete
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this
Pete Travis (li...@petetravis.com) said:
On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to delete
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this
week. The original description always had This COPR will be updated
until Fedora 21 has
On 7 January 2015 at 16:01, Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc wrote:
While I'm not volunteeering to maintain this, I do ask - what is the reason
for deleting it vs. just leaving it around in a EOL state where it's not being
updated?
There are a couple of packages with security bugs.
Richard
--
On Jan 7, 2015 7:23 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to delete
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this
I'm planning to delete
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this
week. The original description always had This COPR will be updated
until Fedora 21 has been released or until the entropy death of the
universe, whichever happens first. so I don't altogether feel too
guilty
14 matches
Mail list logo
