On 12/06/2012 05:39 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Are we talking about something like this:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/471217-autotest/virt02.qa/rpmguard/results/libmemcached-1.0.14-.html
and this:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 23:24 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
wrote:
IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as
submitting a
koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:39 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 23:24 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
wrote:
IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as
submitting a
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 23:24 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
wrote:
IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as
submitting a
koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the
On 12/04/2012 09:32 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
If you're building an update for Fedora, and it has shared libraries or
versioned provides, look to see if any of the shared library versions
have changed (or if the versioned provides have changed).
I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea in the
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:51:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/04/2012 09:32 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
If you're building an update for Fedora, and it has shared libraries or
versioned provides, look to see if any of the shared library versions
have changed (or if the versioned provides
On 2012-12-04 20:30, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:51:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea in the packaging
guidelines to suggest that people list the shared libraries in the
%files section like:
%{_libdir}/libname.so.#*
With the
Hi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as submitting a
koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the maintainer should
seriously consider stepping aside and finding someone else to take
proper
