Re: Did check 0.15.x in rawhide break packages' test suites?

2020-08-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:32 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jerry James wrote: > > You can point the finger of blame at least partly at me for this. > > Version 0.15.0 of check introduced the use of > > __attribute__((printf)) to check the arguments to some of the >

Re: Did check 0.15.x in rawhide break packages' test suites?

2020-08-03 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jerry James wrote: > You can point the finger of blame at least partly at me for this. > Version 0.15.0 of check introduced the use of > __attribute__((printf)) to check the arguments to some of the > calls. However, upstream didn't do it right, with the

Re: Did check 0.15.x in rawhide break packages' test suites?

2020-08-02 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 9:55 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'm looking through F33 FTBFS issues, and I see an increasing number > of packages that fail to build because their test suites (using check) > fail to build with errors like this: > > /usr/include/check.h:502:27: note: declared here > 502

Did check 0.15.x in rawhide break packages' test suites?

2020-08-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, I'm looking through F33 FTBFS issues, and I see an increasing number of packages that fail to build because their test suites (using check) fail to build with errors like this: /usr/include/check.h:502:27: note: declared here 502 | CK_DLL_EXP void CK_EXPORT _ck_assert_failed(const char