Randy Barlow wrote:
> I'm not really sure which way would be better, but I think I lean
> towards thinking that maybe Bodhi really should wait until updates are
> all the way stable before accepting new updates for the same packages.
That would not be acceptable.
Mohan Boddhu's RFE:
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 11:19 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> It doesn't obsolete it if it's already transitioning from testing ->
> stable because it's basically not in "testing" state. This happens
> all
> the time even during the usual cycle, it's generally just not seen
> during the usual cycle
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hey, I've just noticed something that I find a bit odd:
>
> This python38 update is on it's way to f31 stable:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c26f535d3c
>
> This newer python38 update was submitted yesterday:
>
>
On 17. 10. 19 12:19, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey, I've just noticed something that I find a bit odd:
This python38 update is on it's way to f31 stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c26f535d3c
This newer python38
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hey, I've just noticed something that I find a bit odd:
>
> This python38 update is on it's way to f31 stable:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c26f535d3c
>
> This newer python38 update was submitted yesterday:
>
>
Hey, I've just noticed something that I find a bit odd:
This python38 update is on it's way to f31 stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c26f535d3c
This newer python38 update was submitted yesterday:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-adde83b6b7
...but
