On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:36:11AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 16:01 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:18:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I
On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 10:32 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:36:11AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
think of anything
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
at all), where
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:18:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 13:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
at all), where people
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 08:59 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
think of anything
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
at all), where people are regularly storing their passwords and tokens
as environment
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
How about having abrt just remove or scrub all variables that start
with /^OS_/ ? I know it's nasty to have application-specific
treatment of environment variables like this, but the number of
applications that pass auth
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
think of anything else right now.
Rackspace, DigitalOcean, Google Computing Engine etc
Hello,
As you might know ABRT attaches 'environ' file to its Bugzilla bugs. The file
contains a full copy of /proc/[pid]/environ. Even though ABRT highlights
black-listed words and encourages users to review the data before submitting
them, it may happen that the reporter misses something and
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing personal
information?
No but I can imagine in some cases it may be useful.
Couldn't there be a way to send additional information upon bug assignee's
request? That would
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing
personal
information?
No but I can imagine in some cases it may be useful.
Is this a problem in
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 19:02 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing
personal
information?
No but I can imagine in some cases it may be useful.
Couldn't there be a way to
On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 00:28 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing
personal
information?
17 matches
Mail list logo
