Re: EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Schwendt wrote: > Does anybody think the same about EsounD? > We still include it in Fedora. We still build lots of audio packages > for it. But is it still being used by anyone? PulseAudio emulates the ESounD protocol and for some legacy applications (not even all proprietary), it's the

Re: EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.08.10 12:58, Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote: > > > I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or > > should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux). > > In addition it s

Re: EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2010-08-05, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote: > >> I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or >> should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux). >> In addition it supports bidirectional sound transmi

EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote: > I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or > should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux). > In addition it supports bidirectional sound transmission (from > microphone). > > PulseAudio is