On 2013-08-07, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
With the recent addition of arm in our primary buildsystem, I am seeing
some packages add ExcludeArch: arm or ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? arm or armv7hl or some
macro like %{ix86}?
-- Petr
--
devel
On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? arm or armv7hl or some
macro like %{ix86}?
Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use armv7hl because the package
I build works only on armv7 with hfp; but would be good to know if
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? arm or armv7hl or some
macro like %{ix86}?
Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use armv7hl because the
Greetings.
With the recent addition of arm in our primary buildsystem, I am seeing
some packages add ExcludeArch: arm or ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
First, please DO NOT add ExclusiveArch on x86, unless your package
really and truly doesn't build on ANY of our secondary arches too.
(ppc64, s390).
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:36:48PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If you exclude arm support for now, please file a bug against your
package with the information about the missing arm support and then
add F-ExcludeArch-arm to the Blocks field on your bug. This will make
the arm team aware of the
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 22:33:17 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:36:48PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If you exclude arm support for now, please file a bug against your
package with the information about the missing arm support and then
add
Greetings.
With the recent addition of arm in our primary buildsystem, I am seeing
some packages add ExcludeArch: arm or ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
First, please DO NOT add ExclusiveArch on x86, unless your package
really and truly doesn't build on ANY of our secondary arches too.
(ppc64, s390).
