On 8 April 2010 13:06, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 11:30 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
>> On 8 April 2010 01:33, James Laska wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > Representatives from Fedora QA, Rel-Eng and Development met on IRC to
>> > review whether the Fedora 13 Beta release criteria [1]
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:30:12AM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 8 April 2010 01:33, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Representatives from Fedora QA, Rel-Eng and Development met on IRC to
> > review whether the Fedora 13 Beta release criteria [1] have been met.
> > The team agreed that the
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 11:30 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 8 April 2010 01:33, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Representatives from Fedora QA, Rel-Eng and Development met on IRC to
> > review whether the Fedora 13 Beta release criteria [1] have been met.
> > The team agreed that the Beta c
On 8 April 2010 01:33, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Representatives from Fedora QA, Rel-Eng and Development met on IRC to
> review whether the Fedora 13 Beta release criteria [1] have been met.
> The team agreed that the Beta criteria *have* been met with
> F-13-Beta-RC5. For additional de
Greetings,
Representatives from Fedora QA, Rel-Eng and Development met on IRC to
review whether the Fedora 13 Beta release criteria [1] have been met.
The team agreed that the Beta criteria *have* been met with
F-13-Beta-RC5. For additional details, please refer to the attached
minutes.
Thanks,
