On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:48:33 +0200
Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 08:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Should be fixed for tomorrows composes I would expect.
Hi,
doesn't seem to. I made an update for rawhide and f23 branch with
evolution-data-server on Monday
Dne 22.7.2015 v 07:08 Milan Crha napsal(a):
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 06:48 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
Furthermore, I run my rawhide machine today and tried `dnf update`,
which didn't offer me the update of the evolution-data-server. I'd
expect to have it offered after two days of the koji build.
Furthermore, I run my rawhide machine today and tried `dnf update`,
which didn't offer me the update of the evolution-data-server. I'd
expect to have it offered after two days of the koji build.
Maybe I missed some policy/update change?
Hi again,
it looks like a dnf issue, see below.
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 12:45 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
BTW is there an option to turn on the full yum style dep resolution?
-v adds some but not what is pulling in a particular package (or
removing one) as part of a process. I might be strange but I do find
it useful for some use cases.
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 06:48 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
Furthermore, I run my rawhide machine today and tried `dnf update`,
which didn't offer me the update of the evolution-data-server. I'd
expect to have it offered
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 08:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Should be fixed for tomorrows composes I would expect.
Hi,
doesn't seem to. I made an update for rawhide and f23 branch with
evolution-data-server on Monday morning CEST. I know it breaks some
dependencies, because there had been done
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 06:48 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
Furthermore, I run my rawhide machine today and tried `dnf update`,
which didn't offer me the update of the evolution-data-server. I'd
expect to have it offered after two days of the koji build.
Maybe I missed some policy/update change?
What is wrong with the reports? Why broken dependencies are not
checked/reported? Why there is no Rawhide report at all?
Thx
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 14:06 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
What is wrong with the reports? Why broken dependencies are not
checked/reported? Why there is no Rawhide report at all?
When we have branched and have the two reports
Compose started at Mon Jul 20 07:15:03 UTC 2015
New package: dropbox-api-command-1.17-5.fc23
Dropbox API wrapper command
New package: gap-pkg-crystcat-1.1.6-1.fc23
Crystallographic groups catalog
New package: php-guzzlehttp-promises-1.0.1-3.fc23
Guzzle
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
What is wrong with the reports? Why broken dependencies are not
checked/reported? Why there is no Rawhide report at all?
When we have branched and have the two reports they can run
a/ maybe not at the same time
b/ maybe not at the
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:09:06 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 14:06 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
What is wrong with the reports? Why broken dependencies are not
checked/reported? Why
12 matches
Mail list logo
