Dne 30.5.2014 03:03, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Is it true actually? Last time I was checking the Ruby packages contained
different/modified version of upstream JS files.
AFAICT they're both fine.
rubygem-uglifier
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Is it true actually? Last time I was checking the Ruby packages contained
different/modified version of upstream JS files.
AFAICT they're both fine.
rubygem-uglifier includes the main uglify-js via git submodules:
Dne 15.5.2014 22:49, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
two “will need to be
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
two “will need to be modified” references to Ruby/Java/Node.js .
The known
2014-05-15 22:49 GMT+02:00 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to
be
done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly
= Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com
This is multi-release change, already approved for Fedora 20.
2014-05-14 15:17 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
== Scope ==
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets#Scope
This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
two
