Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com writes:
Where are we with this? I see some F23 builds but no updates yet.
Formally, this Change has been removed from the scope of F23 as it
was not ready for Alpha, which is a requirement to have a Change in
a release.
However Zbyszek told me
On 08/19/2015 06:36 AM, Dave Love wrote:
Should MPI packages be OK to push in f23 currently? I've just had
failures from auto-qa like this, though the build actually ran an MPI
test successfully:
not ok - depcheck for Koji build scalasca-2.2.2-2.fc23 # FAIL
---
arch:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:11:04AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 08/19/2015 06:36 AM, Dave Love wrote:
Should MPI packages be OK to push in f23 currently? I've just had
failures from auto-qa like this, though the build actually ran an MPI
test successfully:
not ok - depcheck for
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So the issues I pointed out in my previous mail (conerning
MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH and MPI_FORTRAN_MOD_DIR) above have been resolved. A
batch of F24 rebuilts has been done by Zbyszek, hitting some build failures
along the
On 15.08.2015 13:31, Jan Kurik wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 07/27/2015 04:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 27.07.2015 23 tel:27.07.2015%2023:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
Ok I've now got one
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
On 07/27/2015 04:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 27.07.2015 23:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
Ok I've now got one full build of all MPI packages [1]. Investigating
the output, things are looking good, except for the fact
On 07/27/2015 04:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 27.07.2015 23:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
Ok I've now got one full build of all MPI packages [1]. Investigating
the output, things are looking good, except for the fact that I
realized that I'll also need to handle binaries MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH
and
Ok I've now got one full build of all MPI packages [1]. Investigating
the output, things are looking good, except for the fact that I realized
that I'll also need to handle binaries MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH and
MPI_FORTRAN_MOD_DIR - these directories are outside MPI_HOME and hence
currently don't
On 27.07.2015 23:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
Ok I've now got one full build of all MPI packages [1]. Investigating
the output, things are looking good, except for the fact that I
realized that I'll also need to handle binaries MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH
and MPI_FORTRAN_MOD_DIR - these directories are
On 07/21/2015 09:45 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 21.07.2015 17:41, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/17/2015 09:50 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Yep - I'm now building things in copr [1].
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/smani/rpm-mpi-hooks-testing/
Great. Looks like you need to build a newer
On 21.07.2015 18:03, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/21/2015 09:45 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 21.07.2015 17:41, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/17/2015 09:50 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Yep - I'm now building things in copr [1].
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/smani/rpm-mpi-hooks-testing/
On 07/17/2015 09:50 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Yep - I'm now building things in copr [1].
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/smani/rpm-mpi-hooks-testing/
Great. Looks like you need to build a newer openmpi package in your copr
since I updating it to 1.8.7 in rawhide.
--
Orion
On 21.07.2015 17:41, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/17/2015 09:50 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Yep - I'm now building things in copr [1].
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/smani/rpm-mpi-hooks-testing/
Great. Looks like you need to build a newer openmpi package in your copr
since I updating
On 07/14/2015 08:09 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 23:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/09/2015 03:06 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Ah yes sorry didn't read the contents of fileattrs/libsymlink.attr properly.
But couldn't that be handled with a
%__libsymlink_path ^.*\.so$
On 17.07.2015 17:40, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/14/2015 08:09 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 23:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/09/2015 03:06 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Ah yes sorry didn't read the contents of fileattrs/libsymlink.attr properly.
But couldn't that be handled with a
On 09.07.2015 23:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/09/2015 03:06 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/09/2015 01:14 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 20:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Also, it doesn't seem to get all of the requires quite right. For
On 07/07/2015 03:12 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello
I've got an initial implementation of this using the rpm dependency generator
hooks, as suggested in the other thread [1].
The resulting scripts are here: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/rpm-mpi-hooks/
There is just one problem: an elf
On 07/08/2015 05:03 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 08.07.2015 22:28, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It appears to be sufficient to define this macro anywhere, not just in
elf.attr. So I think it could be added in to a rpm macros file in
openmpi/mpich-devel.
Ah cool, actually it seems to also work if
On 09.07.2015 20:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Also, isn't the -x86_64 redundant? Also though I guess we don't have an mpi
variable MPI_NAME.
Yes it is redundant, but it is the prettiest variable I could find,
given the lack of MPI_NAME.
Also, your trick of using:
for module in $(module
On 09.07.2015 21:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/08/2015 05:03 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Once the package is approved, openmpi and mpich will need to BuildRequire:
rpm-mpi-hooks, and openmpi-devel and mpich-devel will need to Require:
rpm-mpi-hooks.
And finally, once that is done too, all
On 07/09/2015 03:06 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/09/2015 01:14 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 20:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Also, it doesn't seem to get all of the requires quite right. For
scorep-openmpi I have:
Provides:
On 09.07.2015 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/09/2015 01:14 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 20:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Also, it doesn't seem to get all of the requires quite right. For
scorep-openmpi I have:
Provides:
On 07/08/2015 05:03 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Once the package is approved, openmpi and mpich will need to BuildRequire:
rpm-mpi-hooks, and openmpi-devel and mpich-devel will need to Require:
rpm-mpi-hooks.
And finally, once that is done too, all *-openmpi and *-mpich packages will
need to
On 07/09/2015 01:14 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.07.2015 20:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Also, it doesn't seem to get all of the requires quite right. For
scorep-openmpi I have:
Provides: libscorep_adapter_compiler_event.so.2()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
but:
Requires:
On 07/07/2015 03:12 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello
I've got an initial implementation of this using the rpm dependency generator
hooks, as suggested in the other thread [1].
The resulting scripts are here: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/rpm-mpi-hooks/
There is just one problem: an elf
On 08.07.2015 22:28, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It appears to be sufficient to define this macro anywhere, not just in
elf.attr. So I think it could be added in to a rpm macros file in
openmpi/mpich-devel.
Ah cool, actually it seems to also work if I add it directly to
mpi.attrs, meaning that
Hello
I've got an initial implementation of this using the rpm dependency
generator hooks, as suggested in the other thread [1].
The resulting scripts are here:
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/rpm-mpi-hooks/
There is just one problem: an elf binary in an $MPI_HOME subfolder will
now
= Proposed Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmMPIReqProv
Change owner(s): Sandro Mani manisandro at gmail dot com
Have the rpm-build find-provides and find-requires scripts encode the MPI
compiler name in the provides string of a binary
= Proposed Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmMPIReqProv
Change owner(s): Sandro Mani manisandro at gmail dot com
Have the rpm-build find-provides and find-requires scripts encode the MPI
compiler name in the provides string of a binary
29 matches
Mail list logo
