On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:49:45 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> On 05/13/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 13:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> >>
Hello.
On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:49:45 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 13:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> CCing the desktop list, but please keep replies on the Fedora devel
> >> list.
> >>
>
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> With respect, the reason storaged exists is because Udisks2 upstream
> refused to
> accept patches to support LVM. I'm not saying we shouldn't try to
> merge them
> back together, but the fork happened because upstream was obstinate.
On 05/13/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 13:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
CCing the desktop list, but please keep replies on the Fedora devel
list.
At today's FESCo meeting[1], we raised several questions that we
would like to
have answered about this
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 13:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> CCing the desktop list, but please keep replies on the Fedora devel
> list.
>
>
> At today's FESCo meeting[1], we raised several questions that we
> would like to
> have answered about this change.
>
> 1) Have the GNOME,
On 04/14/2016 10:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_UDisks2_by_Storaged
Change owner(s):
* Peter Hatina
* Tomáš Smetana
Storaged extends UDisks2 API by exporting several enterprise features
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 05:09:00 -0400 (EDT)
>> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>
>> > Hey,
>> ...
>> > What are the additional dependencies compared to Udisks2?
>>
>> None
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 05:09:00 -0400 (EDT)
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> ...
> > What are the additional dependencies compared to Udisks2?
>
> None AFAIK: storaged itself should not pull anything else than udisks2 in
> the current
- Original Message -
> > 2) that has its place in a storage API.
> Why is an API providing some additional functionality you are not going
> to use in your specific usecase a problem ?
>
> I'm sure glibc and kernel provide many API calls not directly used by
> the default apps on the
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 05:09:00 -0400 (EDT)
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey,
...
> What are the additional dependencies compared to Udisks2?
None AFAIK: storaged itself should not pull anything else than udisks2 in
the current Rawhide.
> Would gnome-disk-utility, gvfs, etc. work
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 05:09 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey,
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_UDisks2_by_Storaged
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Peter Hatina
> > *
Hey,
- Original Message -
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_UDisks2_by_Storaged
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Peter Hatina
> * Tomáš Smetana
>
> Storaged extends UDisks2 API by exporting several enterprise
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_UDisks2_by_Storaged
Change owner(s):
* Peter Hatina
* Tomáš Smetana
Storaged extends UDisks2 API by exporting several enterprise features
(in form of plugins), such as LVM2 and iSCSI.
13 matches
Mail list logo