Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 04/05/2018 03:29 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 04/05/2018 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 03/29/2018 10:59 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: I believe it's our cmocka tests that occur at rpm package time that brought this to our attention.  So it is easy to reproduce. Well, I tried, but the

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 04/05/2018 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/29/2018 10:59 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: >> I believe it's our cmocka tests that occur at rpm package time that >> brought this to our attention.  So it is easy to reproduce. > > Well, I tried, but the package no longer builds on rawhide, even

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/29/2018 10:59 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: I believe it's our cmocka tests that occur at rpm package time that brought this to our attention.  So it is easy to reproduce. Well, I tried, but the package no longer builds on rawhide, even on x86_64: libtool: error: cannot find the library

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/29/2018 04:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/29/2018 10:25 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: >> We can not back out the atomic work >> because it's needed to address several issues in our server. First of all, I updated the request wiki page to answer some of John's questions. > > One thing

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/29/2018 10:25 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: We can not back out the atomic work because it's needed to address several issues in our server. One thing that's still not clear to me: What happens on 32-bit architectures which do not have 64-bit atomics? Are they buggy in a different way, and

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/28/2018 12:29 AM, John Reiser wrote: > On 03/27/2018 14:17 UTC, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389-ds-base-remove-686 >> >> >> Owner(s): >>    * Mark Reynolds >> >> >> 389-ds-base does not

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 29 March 2018 at 07:00, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > March 29, 2018 12:06 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, 16:24 Florian Weimer, wrote: >> >>> On 03/28/2018 08:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: >>> > Note that

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

March 29, 2018 12:06 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, 16:24 Florian Weimer, wrote: > >> On 03/28/2018 08:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: >> Note that while GCC produces broken code, this is actually an ABI bug, and we cannot

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, 16:24 Florian Weimer, wrote: > On 03/28/2018 08:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > > >> Note that while GCC produces broken code, this is actually an ABI bug, > and > >> we cannot change struct layout rules for long long retroactively. Maybe > we > >> could

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/28/2018 08:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: Note that while GCC produces broken code, this is actually an ABI bug, and we cannot change struct layout rules for long long retroactively. Maybe we could for _Atomic long long, but that would need a lengthy investigation, and I strongly believe

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:58:13AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/28/2018 06:10 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, is this hardware limitation something that is likely to affect other > > packages? Is there something we could look for in how they consume > > atomic types to tell? I would hate

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/28/2018 04:46 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Just to be clear, when other 32 bit architectures don't support it.. if this code was attempted to be compiled on arm32 the compiler complains and errors? Generic 32-bit ARM does not have any 64-bit atomics at all. This is what I meant:

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

So, is this hardware limitation something that is likely to affect other packages? Is there something we could look for in how they consume atomic types to tell? I would hate for us to ship something else that is subject to this problem. <> The way I read some of the comments on the bugs in

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

>>> So, is this hardware limitation something that is likely to affect other >>> packages? Is there something we could look for in how they consume >>> atomic types to tell? I would hate for us to ship something else that is >>> subject to this problem. >> >> >> There is lots of fingerpointing,

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 28 March 2018 at 03:58, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/28/2018 06:10 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> So, is this hardware limitation something that is likely to affect other >> packages? Is there something we could look for in how they consume >> atomic types to tell? I would

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/28/2018 06:10 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, is this hardware limitation something that is likely to affect other packages? Is there something we could look for in how they consume atomic types to tell? I would hate for us to ship something else that is subject to this problem. There is lots

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/27/2018 14:17 UTC, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389-ds-base-remove-686 Owner(s): * Mark Reynolds 389-ds-base does not work properly on i686 hardware in regards to atomic types. Please

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/27/2018 07:17 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: ...snip... > == Detailed description == > 389-ds project have found an issue which causes system instability on > all versions of 1.4.x of the server on i686 platform. This is a > hardware limitation of the platform related to how we consume atomic > types.

F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389-ds-base-remove-686 Owner(s): * Mark Reynolds 389-ds-base does not work properly on i686 hardware in regards to atomic types. == Detailed description == 389-ds project have

F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389-ds-base-remove-686 Owner(s): * Mark Reynolds 389-ds-base does not work properly on i686 hardware in regards to atomic types. == Detailed description == 389-ds project have