Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > DNF does have some broken behaviors, but this isn't one of them. I can't confirm whether this is a broken behavior but I have a strong heuristic that I suspect would make DNF appear wrong here. If I have RPM foo-1 installed that obsoletes

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Neal Gompa wrote: > I consider YUM's behavior of Obsoletes to have been fundamentally > broken since the beginning of time. This age-old argument between you > and the DNF developers on Obsoletes needs to die. I don't see how this can be an "age-old argument", considering that I only discovered

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 4:22 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > In other words, a package superseded by another still gets its > > Obsoletes entries taken into account? I breaks the POLA as far as I'm > > concerned, it means the only way to undo such a mistake is first to > >

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > In other words, a package superseded by another still gets its > Obsoletes entries taken into account? I breaks the POLA as far as I'm > concerned, it means the only way to undo such a mistake is first to > have the mistake only happen in the updates repository, and work

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:19 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > And finally, unlike the old YUM, DNF also processes Obsoletes from old > versions of packages in the GA repositories, so an update can no longer > safely withdraw an Obsoletes. This is a DNF issue and we need a solution in > DNF, but the

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Le vendredi 13 septembre 2019 à 12:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > That's an historical artefact, that made sense when everyone used > > the > > same dozen font on windows, and when each and everyone of them > > could be > > treated as a special case.

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > That's an historical artefact, that made sense when everyone used the > same dozen font on windows, and when each and everyone of them could be > treated as a special case. Nowadays, even on Linux (what a change a > decade made) the font catalog is huge, and font

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Le 2019-09-13 10:39, Kevin Kofler a écrit : Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: The correct thing would have been never to create a narrow liberation subpackage in the first place since narrow is just a face of a font (like bold). In theory, in an ideal world, that makes sense. But in practice,

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > The correct thing would have been never to create a narrow liberation > subpackage in the first place since narrow is just a face of a font > (like bold). In theory, in an ideal world, that makes sense. But in practice, M$ ships separate "Arial" and "Arial

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Le 2019-09-13 00:05, Kevin Kofler a écrit : Marius Schwarz wrote: (in short: no update to 2.00.5-3 was possible via dnf, as packages refer to 2.00.3-1 directly) They don't actually refer to liberation-fonts-2.00.3-1, but to liberation- narrow-fonts, which liberation-fonts-2.00.3-1 claims to

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Marius Schwarz wrote: > (in short: no update to 2.00.5-3 was possible via dnf, as packages refer > to 2.00.3-1 directly) They don't actually refer to liberation-fonts-2.00.3-1, but to liberation- narrow-fonts, which liberation-fonts-2.00.3-1 claims to Provide, but does not actually provide. So

F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Hi, pls refer to *Bug 1751699* for more informations. (in short: no update to 2.00.5-3 was possible via dnf, as packages refer to 2.00.3-1 directly) to name some: cups flute foomatic gstreamer libreoffice tons of lib packages poppler samba