On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 2:39 AM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
The problem is that Anaconda have to start it's own session of dbus
but
dbus-broker, by design, don't have easy way how to do this without
systemd running.
TBH we should probably keep dbus-daemon around until we have a
replacement fo
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 19:12 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 11:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-
> > 20190408.n.0.iso still
> > contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-
> > broker now
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 11:03 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:07 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
> > contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
> >
> > I'
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 11:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
> contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
>
> I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
> an
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:07 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
> contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
>
> I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
> anac
Hi All,
I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
anaconda-core which seems weird.
So should I file a bug against anacon
