Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> On 1/16/23 12:31, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> >> The admin can implement CUPS
> >> authentication but an ipp://localhost:6 open port entirely open to
> >> anyone on the local machine to submit print jobs directly bypassing CUPS.
> >
> >
On 1/18/23 2:46 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 1/17/23 8:19 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Well in a matter of speaking this is doable even without IPP-USB
advertised device. Every application can just send data to printer's
port and IP or get USB interface handler and talk with the device via
USB.
On 1/17/23 8:19 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 1/13/23 15:12, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
Nothing against driverless printing, this is something I really like,
bit I think all the move to HTTP is ignoring the feature that is being
removed, and that I have an use for. There is not
On 1/16/23 12:31, Björn Persson wrote:
Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
The admin can implement CUPS
authentication but an ipp://localhost:6 open port entirely open to
anyone on the local machine to submit print jobs directly bypassing CUPS.
In that case it's also accessible to all the
Hi Robert,
On 1/13/23 15:12, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
Nothing against driverless printing, this is something I really like,
bit I think all the move to HTTP is ignoring the feature that is being
removed, and that I have an use for. There is not possible to have a
printer connected to a
Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> The admin can implement CUPS
> authentication but an ipp://localhost:6 open port entirely open to
> anyone on the local machine to submit print jobs directly bypassing CUPS.
In that case it's also accessible to all the untrusted Javascript junk
that
On 1/13/23 8:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Robert Marcano said:
Nothing against driverless printing, this is something I really
like, bit I think all the move to HTTP is ignoring the feature that
is being removed, and that I have an use for. There is not possible
to have a
Once upon a time, Robert Marcano said:
> Nothing against driverless printing, this is something I really
> like, bit I think all the move to HTTP is ignoring the feature that
> is being removed, and that I have an use for. There is not possible
> to have a printer connected to a computer that
On 1/12/23 1:15 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IPPUSBasPrintScanDependency
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IPPUSBasPrintScanDependency
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IPPUSBasPrintScanDependency
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
11 matches
Mail list logo
