Hi,
Thanks for looking at this, and sorry about the delay I was on PTO for a
few days.
On 6/28/23 09:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
But, IMHO the largest change is moving the boot kernel/initrd to the
ESP, rather than the use of s
Hi,
On 6/22/23 12:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
== Detailed Description ==
As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
loader, and
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> But, IMHO the largest change is moving the boot kernel/initrd to the
> ESP, rather than the use of systemd-boot itself. Given the
> filesystem layout remains the same outside of those two items and
> the BLS entries, all the common to
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:19:46PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 22.06.23 12:24, Jeremy Linton (jeremy.lin...@arm.com) wrote:
>
> > But, IMHO the largest change is moving the boot kernel/initrd to the ESP,
> > rather than the use of systemd-boot itself. Given the filesystem layout
> >
On Do, 22.06.23 12:24, Jeremy Linton (jeremy.lin...@arm.com) wrote:
> But, IMHO the largest change is moving the boot kernel/initrd to the ESP,
> rather than the use of systemd-boot itself. Given the filesystem layout
> remains the same outside of those two items and the BLS entries, all the
> com
Hi,
On 6/23/23 05:27, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
== Detailed Description ==
As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
loader, and moves the kernel + initrd to the EFI system partition
(ESP). It doesn't attempt
> == Detailed Description ==
> As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
> work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
> loader, and moves the kernel + initrd to the EFI system partition
> (ESP). It doesn't attempt to create unified kernel images, so
Hi,
On 6/22/23 12:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
== Detailed Description ==
As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
loader, and
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > It doesn't attempt to create unified kernel images, so the
> > existing `dnf update`, `kdumpctl`, and `make install` in a kernel
> > source directory should all work.
>
> Nitpick: 'make install' invokes /usr/bin/insta
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
> == Detailed Description ==
> As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
> work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
> loader, and moves the kernel + initrd to the EFI system partiti
Hi,
On 6/22/23 11:21, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
13 matches
Mail list logo
