Also, intel wasn't shipping x86_64 systems at the time, FC1 was pretty
specifically AMD64, and there was a lot of weirdness back then.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Justin Forbes
wrote:
> FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary
> arch
FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary
arch at the time, in fact the RH build system couldn't get everything
together and the ISOs were built on my home system. By FC2, this wasn't an
issue anymore. I would not be surprised if the archives were a bit off as
the
On 23 October 2015 at 14:52, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I happened to notice last night that:
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/
>
> seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything
> alphabetically
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I happened to notice last night that:
>
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/
>
> seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything
>
I happened to notice last night that:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/
seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything
alphabetically up to 'beecrypt' and nothing after. Compare to the i386
dir, which looks full: