On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:09:51 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
Are there any objections to moving forward with this? There seems to
be no objections from the kernel maintainers who have been
participating in the discussion on test@ but we wanted a bit more
devel input before moving
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:09:51PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
criterion read:
On 2011-10-10 12:05, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Do any of those cloud providers ever run the stock image or do they roll
their own with a custom built kernel anyways? I don't have a lot of
insight into this but was
Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
criterion read:
The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
criterion
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
SNIP
I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
Amazon, RackSpace, Linode, Tata, IDCF, and virtually every other major
compute cloud
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
SNIP
I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
Amazon,
