On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:08 PM, François Cami wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> >
>> OK after a bunch of additional testing, one thing is certain; grubby
>> and grub-mkconfig are not even remotely crash safe. They do
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
>
> OK after a bunch of additional testing, one thing is certain; grubby
> and grub-mkconfig are not even remotely crash safe. They do not
> fsync() or sync() at all. That's not good no matter the file system.
On Di, 24.04.18 11:36, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> Note that fsync() is actually insufficient at least some of the time
> on all journaled file systems. e.g. dracut -f only does fsync() on the
> copied over initramfs to /boot and that new initramfs is often not
> seen by the
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fr, 20.04.18 12:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> I'm honestly mystified why the plymouth commit hasn't been reverted in
>> the interim. But I'm also mystified why the bootloader folks don't
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Another solution might be to have a dnf plugin that forces a journal
>> flush (not a bad idea in general after loading updates), but that
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
>> And sync() is only sufficient on non-journaled file
>> systems, on journaled file systems sync() only ensures metadata is in
>> the log, it's considered
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
> And sync() is only sufficient on non-journaled file
> systems, on journaled file systems sync() only ensures metadata is in
> the log, it's considered acceptable to depend on log replay to make
> the file system consistent, but of
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fr, 20.04.18 12:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> I'm honestly mystified why the plymouth commit hasn't been reverted in
>> the interim. But I'm also mystified why the bootloader folks don't
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > I'm trying to pin down what exposed this bug:
>> >
>> >
On Fr, 20.04.18 12:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> I'm honestly mystified why the plymouth commit hasn't been reverted in
> the interim. But I'm also mystified why the bootloader folks don't
> give a shit to commit their configuration files to disk when they know
> they can't
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I'm trying to pin down what exposed this bug:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569970
> >
> > The immediate trigger seems to be
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I'm trying to pin down what exposed this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569970
>
> The immediate trigger seems to be that all shutdowns on my system leave the
> XFS root file system in an unclean
I'm trying to pin down what exposed this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569970
The immediate trigger seems to be that all shutdowns on my system leave
the XFS root file system in an unclean state, so that GRUB cannot read
recently written files under /boot (assuming that
13 matches
Mail list logo