On 19. 01. 21 10:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I wasn't clear if the packages you listed in this email are all
packages in Fedora that use the Python 2 macros (seems like a
surprisingly small number if so?)
Yes, except trac plugins and sugar packages, both already broken.
Anyway would it be
I wasn't clear if the packages you listed in this email are all
packages in Fedora that use the Python 2 macros (seems like a
surprisingly small number if so?)
Anyway would it be possible to get a list of all packages in Fedora
still using these macros, grouped or arranged by maintainer?
Rich.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:13 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 01. 21 10:01, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 16. 01. 21 v 8:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >> My point here is that I want to keep Python 2 much longer (for developers
> >> who
> >> unfortunately still need to support it, e.g. for RHEL
On 18. 01. 21 10:01, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 16. 01. 21 v 8:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
My point here is that I want to keep Python 2 much longer (for developers who
unfortunately still need to support it, e.g. for RHEL 7) than I'd like to keep
allowing packages to buiid with it.
Dne 16. 01. 21 v 8:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
My point here is that I want to keep Python 2 much longer (for developers who unfortunately still need to support it,
e.g. for RHEL 7) than I'd like to keep allowing packages to buiid with it.
"Developers who unfortunately still need to support it"
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 2:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 15. 01. 21 22:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I would really rather not have this happen until we're going to retire
> > Python 2 entirely. The Python 2 macros are already separate from the
> > Python 3 ones, so we could just leave them alone
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 2:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 15. 01. 21 22:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I would really rather not have this happen until we're going to retire
> > Python 2 entirely. The Python 2 macros are already separate from the
> > Python 3 ones, so we could just leave them alone
On 15. 01. 21 22:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
I would really rather not have this happen until we're going to retire
Python 2 entirely. The Python 2 macros are already separate from the
Python 3 ones, so we could just leave them alone until we're ready to
just remove Python 2 entirely.
My point here
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:58 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Python2_RPM_Macros
> >
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > The {{package|python2-rpm-macros}} package (containing
> >
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Python2_RPM_Macros
>
>
> == Summary ==
> The {{package|python2-rpm-macros}} package (containing
> `/usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.python2`) will be removed from Fedora 34
> and newer. The python2 RPM
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Python2_RPM_Macros
== Summary ==
The {{package|python2-rpm-macros}} package (containing
`/usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.python2`) will be removed from Fedora 34
and newer. The python2 RPM macros will ceases to exist. Python 2
packages are already not
11 matches
Mail list logo
