On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:47:31AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Since the plan it to Obsolete the old package, I think you should trigger
> on the removal of it:
> %triggerun ntp <= ...
>
> # copy service enablement from the old name to the new name
> if systemctl is-enabled -q
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:05:56AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:38:02AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> > >
> > > The `ntp` package is replaced automatically on upgrade to Fedora 34.
> > > The configuration file
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:38:02AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> >
> > The `ntp` package is replaced automatically on upgrade to Fedora 34.
> > The configuration file ''/etc/ntp.conf'' is saved as to
> > ''/etc/ntp.conf.rpmsave'' and it needs to be renamed
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
>
> The `ntp` package is replaced automatically on upgrade to Fedora 34.
> The configuration file ''/etc/ntp.conf'' is saved as to
> ''/etc/ntp.conf.rpmsave'' and it needs to be renamed to
> ''/etc/ntp.conf'' to be used by `ntpsec`. Otherwise, `ntpsec` will
>
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:29:05AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Tomasz Torcz said:
> > There ARE functional changes. Mainly removal of long-obsolete drivers,
> > full list can be found at:
> > https://docs.ntpsec.org/latest/ntpsec.html#incompatible
> >
Once upon a time, Tomasz Torcz said:
> There ARE functional changes. Mainly removal of long-obsolete drivers,
> full list can be found at:
> https://docs.ntpsec.org/latest/ntpsec.html#incompatible
> https://www.ntpsec.org/removal-plan.html
Yeah, this would break my use of NTP, since I use one
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:00:04AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > == Release Notes ==
> > TBD
> >
>
> Makes sense, though I think the release notes section would be pretty
> easy to write:
>
> "The classic ntpd service was formerly provided by the ntp package.
> The ntp software has significant
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:00:04AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Makes sense, though I think the release notes section would be pretty
> easy to write:
>
> "The classic ntpd service was formerly provided by the ntp package.
> The ntp software has significant security issues and development seems
>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 9:24 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NtpReplacement
>
> == Summary ==
>
> The `ntp` package is replaced with `ntpsec`.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:mlichvar| Miroslav Lichvar]]
> * Email: mlich...@redhat.com
>
> == Detailed Description ==
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NtpReplacement
== Summary ==
The `ntp` package is replaced with `ntpsec`.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mlichvar| Miroslav Lichvar]]
* Email: mlich...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
`ntp` is one of the few NTP implementations provided in Fedora. It
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NtpReplacement
== Summary ==
The `ntp` package is replaced with `ntpsec`.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mlichvar| Miroslav Lichvar]]
* Email: mlich...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
`ntp` is one of the few NTP implementations provided in Fedora. It
11 matches
Mail list logo
