Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/30/2018 06:59 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: Noting here that python2 segfaults now when using profile guided optimizations on x86_64 since the latest gcc update. This is a bug in Python 2.7: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540316 We're working on fixing it. Thanks,

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1:14:43 PM > Subject: Re: GCC broken in rawhide? > > > > Dne 30.1.2018 v 11:16 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a): >

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 30.1.2018 v 11:16 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a): > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:11:02AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 01/30/2018 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > annobin.spec now uses: > >    %undefine _annotated_build > >

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Tom Hughes
On 30/01/18 10:50, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/30/2018 11:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:11:02AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/30/2018 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: annobin.spec now uses:     %undefine

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/30/2018 11:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:11:02AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/30/2018 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: annobin.spec now uses:    %undefine _annotated_build so at least the circular dependency

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:11:02AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/30/2018 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > annobin.spec now uses: > > > > > > > >    %undefine _annotated_build > > > > > > > > so at least the circular dependency is no

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/30/2018 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: annobin.spec now uses:    %undefine _annotated_build so at least the circular dependency is no longer there.  You still have to remember to rebuild it when a new version of GCC comes out however. ...

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: annobin.spec now uses:    %undefine _annotated_build so at least the circular dependency is no longer there.  You still have to remember to rebuild it when a new version of GCC comes out however. ... which apparently has just happened. Yes,

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/29/2018 04:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:55:53PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/29/2018 03:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin (no user-visible improvements, only yet another global distrowide size increase)

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:55:53PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/29/2018 03:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin (no user-visible > >improvements, only yet another global distrowide size increase) really worth > >the circular dependency nightmare

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-29 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/29/2018 03:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin (no user-visible improvements, only yet another global distrowide size increase) really worth the circular dependency nightmare (rebuilding annobin requires GCC, but GCC is configured to not work

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin (no user-visible improvements, only yet another global distrowide size increase) really worth the circular dependency nightmare (rebuilding annobin requires GCC, but GCC is configured to not work without annobin) or is it time to drop the

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 27/01/18 22:31 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 27/01/18 09:39 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/27/2018 01:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 26/01/18 20:11 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/26/2018 07:50 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 27/01/18 09:39 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/27/2018 01:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 26/01/18 20:11 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/26/2018 07:50 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for CC are failing. Yes, we had an

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-27 Thread Philip Kovacs
Is Koschei eventually going to rebuild with the corrected gcc?  I see dependency changes after the last failed build, but Koschei hasn't rebuilt yet. On Saturday, January 27, 2018 4:01 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me,

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-27 Thread Peter Robinson
ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for CC are failing. >>> >>> >>> Yes, we had an internal dependency issue involving annobin (not related >>> to RPM dependencies), fixed by an annobin rebuild. Later, a defective build >>> of annobin was tagged into

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-27 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/27/2018 01:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 26/01/18 20:11 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/26/2018 07:50 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for CC are failing. Yes, we had an internal dependency issue involving annobin (not

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 26/01/18 20:11 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/26/2018 07:50 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for CC are failing. Yes, we had an internal dependency issue involving annobin (not related to RPM dependencies), fixed by an

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/26/2018 07:50 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for CC are failing. Yes, we had an internal dependency issue involving annobin (not related to RPM dependencies), fixed by an annobin rebuild. Later, a defective build of

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:52:24 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Transaction check error: > DEBUG util.py:439:file /usr/share/info/dir conflicts between > attempted installs of annobin-3.2-1.fc28.x86_64 and info-6.5-1.fc28.x86_64 > > Seems related to >

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Remi Collet
Le 26/01/2018 à 12:42, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > This build of annobin has apparently worked: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24466259 > > So you can try building stuff which uses gcc now. Some builds ok, but now DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Transaction check error:

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
This build of annobin has apparently worked: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24466259 So you can try building stuff which uses gcc now. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
... which failed because GCC is broken in Rawhide. Someone else with more powers is going to have to fix this I'm afraid. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I looked at the annobin spec file and it doesn't appear to contain the version of GCC, so I went ahead and just issued a new build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24462980 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/26/2018 08:13 AM, Philip Kovacs wrote: I'm getting: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables This is exactly what I get. Having a look into the corresponing config.log gives the error related annobin, I was referring to. Ralf

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-26 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/26/2018 08:05 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 01/25/2018 10:50 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Digging into details led me to this error: ... cc1: error: fail to initialize plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/plugin/annobin.so annobin: conftest.c: Error: plugin built for compiler version

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-25 Thread Philip Kovacs
I'm getting: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables On Friday, January 26, 2018 1:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for CC are failing. Digging into details led me to this error:

Re: GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-25 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 01/25/2018 10:50 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Digging into details led me to this error: ... cc1: error: fail to initialize plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/plugin/annobin.so annobin: conftest.c: Error: plugin built for compiler version (7.3.1) but run with compiler version (7.2.1)

GCC broken in rawhide?

2018-01-25 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for CC are failing. Digging into details led me to this error: ... cc1: error: fail to initialize plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/plugin/annobin.so annobin: conftest.c: Error: plugin built for compiler version