Le Lun 3 octobre 2011 18:56, Adam Jackson a écrit :
More to the point, your DPI numbers would be per-output anyway, so
there's no picking a single point size preference, the same size in
pixels would be different sizes in millimeters on each output.
So what? Yes dpi needs to be per-output
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
The XP I occasionally can not avoid to use, in its system control menus
has controls to switch between normal, big very big fonts and
expert/advanced controls one can specify fonts sizes for many details
of the DE
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 04:01, Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
The XP I occasionally can not avoid to use, in its system control menus
has controls to switch between normal, big very big fonts and
expert/advanced
On 10/04/2011 09:36 AM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 04:01, Camilo Mesiascam...@mesias.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
The XP I occasionally can not avoid to use, in its system control menus
has controls to switch
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:48:11PM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Hi,
A daft question perhaps, but I thought...
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
How do other
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:56 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
More to the point, your DPI numbers would be per-output anyway, so
there's no picking a single point size preference, the same size in
pixels would be different sizes in millimeters on each output.
In fairness, for my dual head setup I
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:00 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on bringing OLPC up-to-date with all the great efforts
with GNOME 3, systemd, etc.
On the OLPC XO laptops we have quite a strange screen - it is small
(152mm x 114mm) but very high resolution (1200x900 i.e. 201 dots
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:09 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up
the
people in charge
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:34:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
If not blacklisting then whitelisting them, you have the community. This is
X.org's task, though.
Regards,
Jan
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
A daft question perhaps, but I thought...
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
How do other OS' do it?
-Cam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/03/2011 10:48 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Hi,
A daft question perhaps, but I thought...
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
How do other OS' do it?
I don't know that they do. In my use of Windows up through XP, I never
saw
On 10/03/2011 06:01 PM, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
On 10/03/2011 10:48 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Hi,
A daft question perhaps, but I thought...
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
How do other OS' do it?
I don't know that they do. In
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:48:11PM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Hi,
A daft question perhaps, but I thought...
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
How do other OS' do it?
Apple manage by virtue of most of their customers using
On 10/3/11 11:43 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:34:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
If not blacklisting then whitelisting them, you have the community. This is
X.org's task,
Hi,
I'm working on bringing OLPC up-to-date with all the great efforts
with GNOME 3, systemd, etc.
On the OLPC XO laptops we have quite a strange screen - it is small
(152mm x 114mm) but very high resolution (1200x900 i.e. 201 dots per
inch).
Previously, on Fedora 14, we had to adjust the
On 2011/09/30 11:00 (GMT+0100) Daniel Drake composed:
I'm working on bringing OLPC up-to-date with all the great efforts
with GNOME 3, systemd, etc.
On the OLPC XO laptops we have quite a strange screen - it is small
(152mm x 114mm) but very high resolution (1200x900 i.e. 201 dots per
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
Sounds to me like your F14 is using correct DPI while your F16 is forced to
96. Does your F14 have /etc/X11/xorg.conf file or a non-empty
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/?
Bad DPI could certainly be a cause. However, xdpyinfo
On 2011/09/30 13:14 (GMT+0100) Daniel Drake composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
Sounds to me like your F14 is using correct DPI while your F16 is forced to
96. Does your F14 have /etc/X11/xorg.conf file or a non-empty
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/?
Bad DPI could certainly be a cause. However,
Le Ven 30 septembre 2011 12:00, Daniel Drake a écrit :
Can anyone help me understand this behaviour?
rant
There's nothing to understand – this is a new major GNOME release, with
developers that know better than everyone else, and solve problems by ignoring
past experience and hardcoding their
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Someone Gnome-side decided to not trust xorg dpi and added a new heuristic to
'correct' it
I know this is part of a rant.. but any chance you could quantify that
point with a link to a commit, blog post, mailing
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the
people in charge get past their reality denial phase.
/rant
This thread could have let to something constructive... but not so much
anymore now, I guess.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the
people in charge get past their reality denial phase.
/rant
This thread could
On 2011/09/30 11:09 (GMT-0400) Peter Robinson composed:
can you provide an
explanation of the changes and the rationale behind them?
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a playgound rather than software
for
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:12:45PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a playgound rather than software
for users to be productive with, expecting those who don't like their silly
On 30/09/11 17:12, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/09/30 11:09 (GMT-0400) Peter Robinson composed:
can you provide an
explanation of the changes and the rationale behind them?
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Someone Gnome-side decided to not trust xorg dpi and added a new heuristic
to
'correct' it
I know this is part of a rant.. but any chance
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Or
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-settings-daemon/branches/gnome-2-24/plugins/xsettings/gsd-xsettings-manager.c?view=markup#249
(line 249)?
I'm not sure that's relevant for the current codebase. But even so if
you
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Or
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-settings-daemon/branches/gnome-2-24/plugins/xsettings/gsd-xsettings-manager.c?view=markup#249
(line 249)?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
However, it now has a text scaling factor in gsettings that I was not
aware of. So I guess I just need to find an appropriate factor that
makes fonts look OK on the XO.
One problem faced here is that (as noted earlier)
Felix Miata wrote:
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a playgound rather than software
for users to be productive with
What does KDE have to do with this? KDE honors your screen's physical DPI by
default. (It
Daniel Drake wrote:
Summary: GNOME hardcodes DPI to 96 regardless of X configuration.
This is very broken.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rant
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Daniel Drake wrote:
Summary: GNOME hardcodes DPI to 96 regardless of X configuration.
This is very broken.
Gnome: Reliving Window's horrible past, one emulated bug at a time.
At least we can be thankful that
32 matches
Mail list logo
