On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 13:06 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
> > apparently still fight gjs crashes:
>
> It needs mozjs52 that we don't have in Fedora yet.
Well, also, we're in Beta
Reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490351
I am thinking about proposing this as Blocker Bug/PrioritizedBug, it's
pretty significant regression compared to current state on Fedora 26.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On
On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
> apparently still fight gjs crashes:
It needs mozjs52 that we don't have in Fedora yet.
--
Kalev
___
devel mailing list --
Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
apparently still fight gjs crashes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456293
Vít
Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:02 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be quickly
>
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>> I
>> can add the triggers to KDE and other themes as well if their
>> maintainers are fine with it. rdieter?
>
> If you don't mind, please do, thanks.
Looking closer, I'm curious why you chose to go with:
%transfiletriggerin --
On 2017-09-06 13:16, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>>> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons
>>> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin --
>>> %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
Kalev Lember wrote:
> I
> can add the triggers to KDE and other themes as well if their
> maintainers are fine with it. rdieter?
If you don't mind, please do, thanks.
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
> [..]
>>> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
>>> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and
>>> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary
>>>
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons
> > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin --
> > %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
> >
On 6 September 2017 at 13:02, Kalev Lember wrote:
[..]
> > Seems like packages installing other themes *already* are doing exactly
> > what I've been thinking that they should be doing so updating per icon
> > theme strategy should be OK.
>
> Right, I added file triggers
On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons
> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerpostun -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
>
On 6 September 2017 at 09:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
[..]
> I think we implemented file triggers in Mageia for this, I'll need to
> do some checking. I know that we're pretty aggressive on package,
> transaction, and file trigger usage compared to Fedora... Heck, we
> don't even
On 6 September 2017 at 11:43, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
[..]
> 3) As long as hicolor theme is default theme updating its cache can
> still be in gtk-update-icon-cache package.
>
> What happens with other directories than /usr/share/icons/hicolor is
> in this case secondary
On 6 September 2017 at 09:24, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
[..]
> That is NOT true for gtk-update-icon-cache. There is currently no trigger
> for it, at least when I look at the recent information on the wiki [1].
OK. Just started working on add this (I see a lot
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
> Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko:
>>
>> On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> [..]
It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko:
On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
[..]
It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and
update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all
On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
[..]
>> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
>> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and
>> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary
>> changes are done over rpm
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 5 September 2017 at 15:02, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be
>> quicklynecessary chaith all followed by final 3.26.0 next week.
>
> It would be good to start remove on this cycle
On 5 September 2017 at 15:02, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be quicklynecessary
> chaith all
> followed by final 3.26.0 next week.
It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
Hi all,
It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be quickly
followed by final 3.26.0 next week.
To help prepare the updates, we have a f27-gnome side tag / build target
for Fedora 27 as usual. If you are helping with the builds, please use
'fedpkg build --target f27-gnome' for
20 matches
Mail list logo