Thanks for helping think about this, both of you! Let me try to reply to
both of your emails in the same reply.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 8:04 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:38 PM Yaakov Selkowitz
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 19:13 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:38 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 19:13 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:47 PM Yaakov Selkowitz
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Since the previous libgweather versions were 40.y and the new
> > > versions
> > > are 4.4.z, shouldn't
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 19:13 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:47 PM Yaakov Selkowitz
>
> wrote:
>
> > Since the previous libgweather versions were 40.y and the new
> > versions
> > are 4.4.z, shouldn't there be an Epoch?
> >
>
> I was thinking about this hard as well and I
Hi Yaakov,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:47 PM Yaakov Selkowitz
wrote:
> Since the previous libgweather versions were 40.y and the new versions
> are 4.4.z, shouldn't there be an Epoch?
>
I was thinking about this hard as well and I managed to convince myself
that it should be fine without an
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 17:59 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Just a quick heads up that I'm in the process of renaming
> libgweather4
> package
> back to libgweather - we only ship a single libgweather version in
> rawhide
> (and
> in F39), so there is no need any more to have the API version encoded
Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that I'm in the process of renaming libgweather4
package
back to libgweather - we only ship a single libgweather version in rawhide
(and
in F39), so there is no need any more to have the API version encoded in the
package name in order to make it parallel
