On 2/8/23 15:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
More generally podman can run containers of foreign architectures using
qemu-user emulation, albeit with an obvious speed penalty. Still this
has been useful for testing issues on non-x86_64 arches where hardware
access is hard to come by.
Hold up,
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 22:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 2/7/23 07:52, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lokesh Mandvekar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are still active users of Fedora IoT
On 2/7/23 07:52, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lokesh Mandvekar
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using
>>> containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away
On 2/8/23 09:51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
...
Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
should not be impacted.
More generally podman can run
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> ...
> > > Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
> > > should not be impacted.
> >
> > More generally podman can run containers of foreign
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
...
> > Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
> > should not be impacted.
>
> More generally podman can run containers of foreign architectures using
> qemu-user emulation, albeit with an obvious speed penalty.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:17:16PM +0530, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:01 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> > Does dropping the 32-bit i686 build also imply you cannot use 32-bit
> > containers on a 64-bit architecture? If so, will anybody notice? Since you
> > did not
Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
> should not be impacted.
Good to know. Then I think nobody will miss the i686 build or even notice
its absence (considering that it is not a shared library and that pure i686
installations of Fedora
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:01 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> Does dropping the 32-bit i686 build also imply you cannot use 32-bit
> containers on a 64-bit architecture? If so, will anybody notice? Since you
> did not use any special naming tricks (both package naming and file naming)
> to allow
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:06 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> As for i686, you don't need extra paperwork thanks to exclude packages
> thanks to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval.
> You just need to properly handle dependent packages. You cannot
> ExcludeArch a
Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versions, and not just the upcoming ones.
In
2023-02-07T11:43:53Z Lokesh Mandvekar :
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versions, and not just the
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:12 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 07:38, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lokesh,
>>
>> Lokesh Mandvekar writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
>> > and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using
> > containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away before the
> > F-36 EOL in the late May/early June
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 07:38, Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Hi Lokesh,
>
> Lokesh Mandvekar writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> > and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> > https://github.com/containers org. We would
Hi Lokesh,
Lokesh Mandvekar writes:
> Hi,
>
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versions, and not just
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using
> containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away before the
> F-36 EOL in the late May/early June timeframe.
I see. I guess we could leave armhfp be until then. Btw,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:43 AM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora
Hi,
We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
released Fedora versions, and not just the upcoming ones.
What Fedora paperwork do we need
19 matches
Mail list logo
