On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
That doesn't work as nicely as perhaps it should because
yum downgrade firefox
only downgrades firefox and not xulrunner, and as a result the downgraded
firefox refuses to run. You
On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote:
Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain.
Running a fully updated system, I upgraded to firefox-3.6 in
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:08 +, M A Young wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
That doesn't work as nicely as perhaps it should because
yum downgrade firefox
only downgrades firefox and not xulrunner, and
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote:
Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
a lot of extra work for not a lot of
On 1 February 2010 19:23, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote:
Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't
Wes Shull wrote:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
NEVER do that!!!
You probably have way more Rawhide packages than just Firefox now. At least
xulrunner and all the stuff using its unstable API, probably also sqlite
and a lot more stuff. Each time your package depends on a newer
Mail Lists wrote:
I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new api
anyway is it?
The IcedTea plugin is in Fedora (as java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin). Fedora does
not and will not ship proprietary software such as the Sun Java plugin (from
the non-open JDK or JRE).
A new
Frank Murphy wrote:
You can update to 3.6
from Rawhide,
then disable rawhide again.
Which is what I have done,
no problems yet.
NEVER do that!!!
You probably have way more Rawhide packages than just Firefox now. At least
xulrunner and all the stuff using its unstable API, probably also
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Wes Shull wrote:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
NEVER do that!!!
If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in
a grand total of sqlite and xulrunner. Yeehaw.
If anything, you
On 31 January 2010 08:14, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Christopher Brown wrote:
This is because 3.5.7 doesn't affect us. Stability issue is for
Windows people and update notification is patched out for obvious
reasons.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Wes Shull wrote:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
NEVER do that!!!
If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in
a grand total
On 31/01/10 12:59, M A Young wrote:
--snipped--
If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it
sucks in
a grand total of sqlite and xulrunner. Yeehaw.
At the moment it does for you, though more updates may be required
depending on what you have installed, but you
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
True, but if necessary.
You can always yum downgrade x
Especially if you just need to check out package x.
In such scenarios you might find the ``yum history'' command useful
since it can easily undo upgrades that include
So it doesn't have an official one?
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Liu Yu Fei Eric
hoveringnowi...@gmail.comwrote:
So it doesn't have an official one?
I've been running the f13 build out of rawhide for a week now, and it's
worked fine for me... not sure about Java though.
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
--wes
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Liu Yu Fei Eric hoveringnowi...@gmail.com
wrote:
So it doesn't have an official one?
I've been running the f13 build out of rawhide for a week now, and it's
worked fine for me... not sure about Java though.
yum
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
Hi,
I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
On 30/01/10 08:42, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
So it doesn't have an official one?
Not in F12,
but as has been said.
You can update to 3.6
from Rawhide,
then disable rawhide again.
Which is what I have done,
no problems yet.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
On 30 January 2010 19:00, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 01/30/2010 01:53 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
Hi,
I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a
On 01/30/2010 02:54 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
Well there's the Java and Totem plugins at least, but there's a whole
slew of apps in Fedora that build against xulrunner:
I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new api
anyway is it?
repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps
On 30 January 2010 20:04, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 01/30/2010 02:54 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
Well there's the Java and Totem plugins at least, but there's a whole
slew of apps in Fedora that build against xulrunner:
I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new
On 01/30/2010 05:37 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain.
I much prefer chrome and use it preferentially now anyway ... I'd
prefer we put any broswer related energy into chromium - it is
Hi,
I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/01/22/Firefox-3.6-en
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
24 matches
Mail list logo