Res: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen

2010-03-13 Thread Henrique Junior
Hello, folks. Is there anyone available to review the packages? gluegen - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572512 jogl - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 Veja quais são os

Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen

2010-03-01 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 15:49 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: On 02/28/2010 03:39 PM, Henrique Junior wrote: As Chen Lei said, the fact that JOGL needs this code may mean that it will be blocked forever for packaging, but I do not particularly see a big problem. For more details, please, read

Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen

2010-02-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hans de Goede wrote: AFAIK we have had problems like this before with various bits of Xorg (iirc) needing the sources of other bits to build. The usual solution for this, is to give a package a -source subpackage, which contains the extracted sources (and installs them under /usr/src So

Re:Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen

2010-02-28 Thread Chen Lei
I think we need some more experienced java packager to accelerate packaging scilab, it can be a new feature for F14. Since scilab may be the best opensource numerical computational software, is there someone interseted in packaging scilab for fedora? Regard, Chen Lei

Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen

2010-02-28 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
Scilab?is,?in?fact,?in?advanced?packaging?stage,?waiting?for?JOGL. A lot of java packages need package from scratch or patch(this may be difficult if you are not provenpackager, since some package maintainers are non-responsive for a long while) for scliab5.2.1. Please give us the