On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 10:57 +0200, drago01 wrote:
Well in gnome 3.2 (which should be out for F16) extensions will be
like firefox extensions i.e you go to extensions.gnome.org and click
install to install an extension.
Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
So, just so I
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 02:23 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
David: on the subject of your followup...my advice, by the way, is that
life is too short to continue to try to explain why GNOME Shell is
unusable for folks like you and I. I'd just switch to XFCE and be done
with it. My machines are a lot
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 02:23 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
So, just so I understand, the requirement/assumption is that all
machines will be online and pulling bits down directly from GNOME? That
won't map at all to enterprise or non-fully connected environments. It
needs to be possible to
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the
gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the
same plans or are already working on this, please let me know.
So we can avoid doing double work.
Did you do this?
On 07/29/2011 07:47 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the
gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the
same plans or are already working on this, please let me know.
So we
Hi,
On 07/29/2011 09:47 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the
gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the
same plans or are already working on this, please let me know.
On 07/29/2011 01:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
There does exit an [1] rpm and an srpm [2] here by the do we have
guidelines on how to package additional extensions I guess official and
unofficial ones?
The only one we have is at
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 07/29/2011 09:47 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the
gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:57:59 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
[citation needed]
--Stijn
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:57:59 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
[citation needed]
On 07/29/2011 08:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
Well in gnome 3.2 (which should be out for F16) extensions will be
like firefox extensions i.e you go to extensions.gnome.org and click
install to install an extension.
Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
Is it not then better to setup
2011/7/29 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 07/29/2011 08:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
Well in gnome 3.2 (which should be out for F16) extensions will be
like firefox extensions i.e you go to extensions.gnome.org and click
install to install an extension.
Distro packaged extensions are
On 07/29/2011 09:21 AM, drago01 wrote:
2011/7/29 Jóhann B. Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com:
On 07/29/2011 08:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
Well in gnome 3.2 (which should be out for F16) extensions will be
like firefox extensions i.e you go to extensions.gnome.org and click
install to install an
2011/7/29 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 07/29/2011 09:21 AM, drago01 wrote:
2011/7/29 Jóhann B. Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com:
On 07/29/2011 08:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
Well in gnome 3.2 (which should be out for F16) extensions will be
like firefox extensions i.e you go to
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:31:35AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
2011/7/29 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 07/29/2011 09:21 AM, drago01 wrote:
2011/7/29 Jóhann B. Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com:
On 07/29/2011 08:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
Well in gnome 3.2 (which should be out for F16)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:36:50 +0200
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
I would strongly prefer third parties not to reinvent whole
packaging and repositories concept. Some companies grasp it (I have
yum repos provided for Google Earth and Talk Plugin, Dell BIOSes and
firmwares, Adobe
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:15 +0200, drago01 wrote:
Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
[citation needed]
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2011-June/msg00164.html
Seriously, who cares? Upstream are clearly on crack these days anyway.
The best way to
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:28, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:15 +0200, drago01 wrote:
Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
[citation needed]
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2011-June/msg00164.html
Seriously, who
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Ron Yorston wrote:
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
together.
Except the Shut Down menu extension directly conflicts with the
alternative-status-menu extension. Sub-packages are the
Hi all,
Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the
gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the
same plans or are already working on this, please let me know.
So we can avoid doing double work.
I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery
extension
Hans de Goede wrote:
I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery
extension collection, so that people can install only those
which they want without automatically getting all of
them.
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
together.
I understand that
Hi Ron,
Am 01.06.2011 11:19, schrieb Ron Yorston:
Hans de Goede wrote:
I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery
extension collection, so that people can install only those
which they want without automatically getting all of
them.
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they
Ron Yorston wrote:
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
together.
Except the Shut Down menu extension directly conflicts with the
alternative-status-menu extension. Sub-packages are the safest bet.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
23 matches
Mail list logo
