Re: Intent to retire: nss_ldap

2012-06-08 Thread Brian Wheeler
on our RHEL6 servers I'm still using nss_ldap for the hosts database: we have a private network and I don't want to copy portions of /etc/hosts around to our servers and putting them into DNS isn't really an option for us. I couldn't find an easy way to look up the data in ldap for that data

Re: Intent to retire: nss_ldap

2012-06-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 09:06 -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote: on our RHEL6 servers I'm still using nss_ldap for the hosts database: we have a private network and I don't want to copy portions of /etc/hosts around to our servers and putting them into DNS isn't really an option for us. I couldn't

Re: Intent to retire: nss_ldap

2012-06-08 Thread Brian Wheeler
I'll investigate it when we get to another system change but since its working on the current servers I'm not touching it :) By the time we do an OS refresh I'll probably try moving to IPA Brian On 06/08/2012 10:14 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 09:06 -0400, Brian

Intent to retire: nss_ldap

2012-06-07 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, I would like to retire PADL's nss_ldap and pam_ldap from current Rawhide. SSSD has been the default in Fedora for quite a few releases with nss-pam-ldapd as another option for deployments that, for some reason, do not want to migrate to the SSSD. nss_ldap also seems to be abandoned upstream.