Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-14 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 07/13/2015 02:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel (some even use reverse

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/13/2015 02:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-14 Thread Haïkel
2015-07-14 10:24 GMT+02:00 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com: On 07/13/2015 02:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-14 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 07/14/2015 06:19 PM, Haïkel wrote: I maintain most of patches as commits in private branches of upstream git repos and generate them with git format-patch latest-release-tag. %autosetup and %autopatch don't work with patches generated this way, while %patch does. Works for me, you need

Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Hi When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel (some even use reverse patches). %autosetup was created to handle that

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I think it's because no one told that it exists ;) On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote: Hi When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages.

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi, it's quite new feature in rpmbuild: http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Autosetup I.e. since rpm-4.11. Cheers, Jindrich On Jul 13, 2015 1:40 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote: Hi When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Björn Persson
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel (some even use reverse patches). %autosetup was

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 14:39 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Is it because no one told that it exists? Or maybe because implementation has some issues which no one wants to fix? Or other (I exclude laziness of package maintainers)? rpm macros only get used if they work on the oldest OS

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 13.07.2015 o 15:22, Adam Jackson pisze: On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 14:39 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Is it because no one told that it exists? Or maybe because implementation has some issues which no one wants to fix? Or other (I exclude laziness of package maintainers)? rpm macros

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Hi When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel (some

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Hi When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Haïkel
2015-07-13 16:20 GMT+02:00 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com: maybe pull `rdopkg update-patches` into `fedpkg` ? That's more or less, what I'll be suggesting in my patch management session at Flock ;) btw, rdopkg now handles properly %autosetup \o/ H. cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 15:21 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Monday, July 13, 2015 09:13:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Is anyone maintaining fedpkg now? fedpkg has active maintainership and development. does not mean that every corner case is know about of gets attention. fedpkg might

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Hi When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that there is no such thing as patch

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-13 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Monday, July 13, 2015 09:13:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Hi When I moved to Fedora after years of