> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:55 PM Jan Drögehoff wrote:
>
> tstellar already answered in a different thread:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
I can understand if there is no compatibility package because there hasn't been
a use for one
though I
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:55 PM Jan Drögehoff wrote:
>
> I've been wondering for a while but I haven't had time to ask this, why is
> there no lld compatibility package?
> clang and llvm have them and only lld seems to lack it.
> I'd understand it if lld was just a linker but i
I've been wondering for a while but I haven't had time to ask this, why is
there no lld compatibility package?
clang and llvm have them and only lld seems to lack it.
I'd understand it if lld was just a linker but it also provides many libraries
and development files that can have brekaing
