On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:16 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> xconvers (maintained by: hobbes1069)
> xconvers-0.8.3-29.fc36.x86_64 requires libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
>
> still only available on aur and Fedora
> https://repology.org/project/xconvers/versions
This can probably be retired. I'll check on
V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 08:36:55AM -, Leigh Scott napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 00:15 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > xvattr (maintained by: ppisar, thias)
> > gxvattr-1.3-44.fc36.x86_64 requires libgdk-1.2.so.0()(64bit), libglib-
> > 1.2.so.0()(64bit), libgtk-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
> >
>
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 00:15 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Continuing I brought the corrections to Fedora 36
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-db793ad26c
>
> Now only 4 packages more gtk1+ depends on glib
>
> Depending packages (rawhide) (5): bubblemon gtk+ manedit
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 00:15 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Leigh Scott kirjoitti 9.3.2022 klo 18.15:
> > > Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 7.3.2022 klo 18.17:
> > > Crossfire and freedroidrpg are games, so "is it needed?" and
> > > "does it
> > > have a replacement?" are not good questions to ask. A
Peter Boy (p...@uni-bremen.de) said:
> And, by the way, it is one of Linux’s (and Fedora Linux’s) core
> distinguishing features that it does not follow the short-term commercial
> life cycles, but enables long-term usability, for "old" hardware as well
> as software. And we should not give that
Leigh Scott kirjoitti 9.3.2022 klo 18.15:
Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 7.3.2022 klo 18.17:
Crossfire and freedroidrpg are games, so "is it needed?" and
"does it
have a replacement?" are not good questions to ask. A better question
would be "does anybody want to play it?". Games do not really ever
> On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 16:01 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Hi Leigh ,
> yes , it looks like glib-devel is not needed , I'm curious , how do you
> find these mistakes ?
>
> Thank you
I checked the built rpm requires and did mock test builds.
___
> Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 7.3.2022 klo 18.17:
> Crossfire and freedroidrpg are games, so "is it needed?" and
> "does it
> have a replacement?" are not good questions to ask. A better question
> would be "does anybody want to play it?". Games do not really ever
> become obsolete, each is a unique
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:51:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:41:30AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > The maintainer is unwilling to retire them.
> > >
> > > I think we should ask FESCo to force them to be retired. It's
On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 16:01 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 10:29:02 -0600
> > Michael Catanzaro >
> >
> > I'm not unwilling to retire them, I just want their users to be
> > retired
> > first so I don't leave a bunch of broken dependencies behind.
> >
> > Paul.
>
> dillo,
On Wed, 2022-03-09 at 08:20 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 7.3.2022 klo 18.17:
> > Hi,
> > In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
> > apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
> > these packages is needed ? or haven't replacement ?
> >
Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 7.3.2022 klo 18.17:
Hi,
In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
these packages is needed ? or haven't replacement ?
Depending packages (rawhide) (20): crossfire crossfire-client crossfire-maps
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:41:30AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > The maintainer is unwilling to retire them.
> >
> > I think we should ask FESCo to force them to be retired. It's confusing
> > to have ancient versions of the packages in the distro, and they
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 10:29:02 -0600
> Michael Catanzaro
>
> I'm not unwilling to retire them, I just want their users to be retired
> first so I don't leave a bunch of broken dependencies behind.
>
> Paul.
dillo, alsa-tools, gnubg, and tilda don't rely on glib or gtk+, the package
On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 01:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > The maintainer is unwilling to retire them.
> >
> > I think we should ask FESCo to force them to be retired. It's
> > confusing
> > to have ancient versions of the packages in the distro, and they will
> Am 08.03.2022 um 01:41 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel
> :
>
> I do not see why we would want to force removing working, maintained
> packages from the distribution. That is a major disservice to users and
> basically a "screw you" to the maintainer. Whom does that help?
>
> GLib 1 and
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Broken dependencies will be automatically retired if they are not fixed
> within a certain time, so it's really OK to do this. The broken
> packages won't stick around forever: they will eventually get cleaned
> up.
In other words, leaf applications that end users care
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> The maintainer is unwilling to retire them.
>
> I think we should ask FESCo to force them to be retired. It's confusing
> to have ancient versions of the packages in the distro, and they will
> stick around forever if not.
I do not see why we would want to force
On Mon, Mar 7 2022 at 04:48:27 PM +, Paul Howarth
wrote:
I'm not unwilling to retire them, I just want their users to be
retired
first so I don't leave a bunch of broken dependencies behind.
Hi, sorry, maybe I misunderstood your previous statements.
Broken dependencies will be
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 10:29:02 -0600
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7 2022 at 04:17:09 PM +, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
> > apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
> > these packages is needed ? or
Hi
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:29 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7 2022 at 04:17:09 PM +, Sérgio Basto
> > Hi,
> > In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
> > apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
> > these packages is needed ? or haven't
On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 16:17 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
> apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
> these packages is needed ? or haven't replacement ?
>
> Thanks
>
> alsa-tools (maintained by: perex, timj)
On Mon, Mar 7 2022 at 04:17:09 PM +, Sérgio Basto
wrote:
Hi,
In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
these packages is needed ? or haven't replacement ?
The maintainer is unwilling to retire them.
I think we
Hi,
In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
these packages is needed ? or haven't replacement ?
Thanks
[1]
Depending packages (rawhide) (20): NsCDE alsa-firmware alsa-tools
bubblemon crossfire crossfire-client
24 matches
Mail list logo
