Mono.Cecil

2010-12-08 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, Mono.Cecil has been a pain in the backside for many moons with the advice being to ditch the version which ships with package and try and use the version bundled with mono itself (which is version 0.6-ish). Unfortunately, this is leading to a number of problems (db4o 7.4 up won't work like

Mono.Cecil

2010-12-08 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, Mono.Cecil has been a pain in the backside for many moons with the advice being to ditch the version which ships with package and try and use the version bundled with mono itself (which is version 0.6-ish). Unfortunately, this is leading to a number of problems (db4o 7.4 up won't work like

Re: Mono.Cecil and monodevelop

2010-05-18 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 05/18/2010 10:12 AM, Paul wrote: Hi, For quite a while the packaging of monodevelop has patched using the supplied version of mono.cecil with the one found in gac (which according to the mono bods, isn't the right place for it - it is a work in progress so should not be considered stable

Re: Mono.Cecil and monodevelop

2010-05-18 Thread Paul
Hi, As the new MD relies on a version of Mono.Cecil which is newer than the version in gac is it permissible to ship MD-2.4 with this newer version? The version in gac remains untouched by this new version so other applications reliant on the old version will still run. Wouldn't

Re: Mono.Cecil and monodevelop

2010-05-18 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 05/18/2010 02:48 PM, Paul wrote: Hi, As the new MD relies on a version of Mono.Cecil which is newer than the version in gac is it permissible to ship MD-2.4 with this newer version? The version in gac remains untouched by this new version so other applications reliant on the old version

Re: Mono.Cecil and monodevelop

2010-05-18 Thread Paul
Hi, We could even package the older mono-cecil in a mono-cecil0690 package, as a last resort, but we should definitely try porting the apps first. And to add further problems - guess what the version number is for mono-cecil bundled with MD? And they're not the same Grr TTFN Paul --

Re: Mono.Cecil and monodevelop

2010-05-18 Thread Paul
Hi, And to add further problems - guess what the version number is for mono-cecil bundled with MD? And they're not the same I'm going to guess that it is either undefined or less than the 0.6.90 version that the system mono.cecil has... Reports as 0.6.90 but a quick diff shows

Re: Mono.Cecil and monodevelop

2010-05-18 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 05/18/2010 05:38 PM, Paul wrote: Hi, And to add further problems - guess what the version number is for mono-cecil bundled with MD? And they're not the same I'm going to guess that it is either undefined or less than the 0.6.90 version that the system mono.cecil has... Reports