On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:51:52PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I would also suspect code generation or GC. Did you try asking on
upstream Coq / OCaml mailing lists?
No, I haven't. But see below.
Having said
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I would also suspect code generation or GC. Did you try asking on
upstream Coq / OCaml mailing lists?
No, I haven't. But see below.
Having said that, relatively long-running programs are working OK for
me.
How
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:09:17PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having a problem with building the coq package for the new OCaml
4.00.0, and I'm at my wits' end. There were some bad interactions
between the new
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having a problem with building the coq package for the new OCaml
4.00.0, and I'm at my wits' end. There were some bad interactions
between the new OCaml, camlp5, and coq which I think I have
successfully worked
I'm having a problem with building the coq package for the new OCaml
4.00.0, and I'm at my wits' end. There were some bad interactions
between the new OCaml, camlp5, and coq which I think I have
successfully worked around. (It isn't pretty, but it seems to do the
job.) But now, after the tools
