On 02/24/2015 05:58 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote:
In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper
we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream
version
and let user now what is changed.
On 02/24/2015 05:58 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote:
In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper
we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream
version
and let user now what is changed.
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:36:11 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
If you encounter bugs or have requests for enhancement, as always please do
file them[6][7][8]..
Done. Thanks for a premature April Fool's prank. ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:42:49AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:33:34AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
A A This looks cool.
A A On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 24.2.2015 v 14:25 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
https://release-monitoring.org/projects/updates/failed
Weird pagination
When you filter?
Yes I found this out and it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 24.2.2015 v 14:25 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
https://release-monitoring.org/projects/updates/failed
Weird pagination
Vít
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU7ddnAAoJEAzgnueZF7h8BGYP/jCRcMcGX2jDnd0tegwer9I8
Dne 25.2.2015 v 15:23 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 24.2.2015 v 14:25 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
https://release-monitoring.org/projects/updates/failed
Weird pagination
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:36:11PM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
On 02/20/2015 09:36 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
systems[1] now used to
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote:
On 02/20/2015 09:36 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
Names of systems:
- pkgdb is the familiar Fedora Package DB
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb
It provides some flags used by the other systems.
- anitya is the web app
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:59:24AM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote:
Excerpts from Ralph Bean's message of 2015-02-21 06:36 +10:00:
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying
the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream
Release
This looks cool.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote:
- Enable the monitoring flag for that Fedora package in pkgdb2[4].
I think this is the step people will forget to do. If there was at
least a reminder on the release-monitoring website, that would be
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:33:34AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
This looks cool.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote:
- Enable the monitoring flag for that Fedora package in pkgdb2[4].
I think this is the step people will forget to do. If
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:33:34AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
This looks cool.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote:
- Enable the monitoring flag for that Fedora
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote:
In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper
we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream
version
and let user now what is changed. E.g. Binaries are missing, soname bump
Excerpts from Ralph Bean's message of 2015-02-21 06:36 +10:00:
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
systems[1] now used to coordinate upstream release monitoring on
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
systems[1] now used to coordinate upstream release monitoring on
18 matches
Mail list logo
