Non-responsive maintainer check for liquidat

2024-05-30 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On behalf of KDE SIG, and pursuant to the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I'm trying to reach Roland Wolters (FAS: liquidat), the sole maintainer of audex[1]. audex has been promoted to KDE Gear, and therefore KDE SIG wishes to co-maintain it in order to update it in tandem with the rest

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

2024-05-03 Thread Tomi Lähteenmäki
On ti, huhti 30 2024 at 14.07.47 +02:00:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote: plus work related email (added to cc) Thank you! I was able to get a reply in Mastodon. -Tomi -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

2024-04-30 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 30. 04. 24 v 12:25 odp. Tomi Lähteenmäki napsal(a): Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of phosh [1] and phoc [2]. Allan has tried to reach out for him without success [3] so I created bug [4] for this non-responsive maintainer check. If someone knows how to contact him, please let me

Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

2024-04-30 Thread Tomi Lähteenmäki
Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of phosh [1] and phoc [2]. Allan has tried to reach out for him without success [3] so I created bug [4] for this non-responsive maintainer check. If someone knows how to contact him, please let me know. Best Regards, Tomi Lähteenmäki [1] <ht

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for aarapov

2024-04-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
(Adding Eugene for increased visibility) On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:38:01PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote: > Hello Lichen, > > I commented on the issue. Apologies, I didn’t spot it earlier; > https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/1695 > > https://pagure.io/user/esyr Eugene Syromiatnikov,

Non-responsive maintainer check for aarapov

2024-04-14 Thread Lichen Liu
Hello devel-list! Does anyone know how to contact @aarapov, the maintainer of dmidecode? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275034 I haven't seen any activity recently, and there is a find-inactive-packagers ticket: https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/1695

Re: Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

2024-03-28 Thread Björn Persson
Pavel Zhukov wrote: > I see you have received review of the MR . Emails have been answered by > Bjorn too. If you don't have time to maintain Aunit, then please give me or Dennis access to the package so we can take care of it. Björn Persson pgpFCmfiDkSCT.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

2024-03-28 Thread Dennis van Raaij
Hi Pavel, Thanks for your response. > I see you have received review of the MR . Yes, indeed. I'm grateful that Bjorn was willing to have look at the PR despite not being a co-maintainer of the package. > Emails have been answered by Bjorn too. Yes, but I got no reply from you as the sole

Re: Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

2024-03-28 Thread Pavel Zhukov
I see you have received review of the MR . Emails have been answered by Bjorn too. -- Pavel On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, at 20:17, Dennis van Raaij wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to contact package maintainer Pavel Zhukov (landgraf). > > I submitted a proposal to update package 'aunit' some

Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

2024-03-28 Thread Dennis van Raaij
Hi, I've been trying to contact package maintainer Pavel Zhukov (landgraf). I submitted a proposal to update package 'aunit' some months ago [1] but received no response from its maintainer, Pavel Zhukov. This proposal supersedes an earlier one for which I received no response either. I tried to

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dagostinelli

2024-03-28 Thread Arthur Bols
] is the bug for this non-responsive maintainer check for dagostinelli. I can also (co-)maintain the package as it is a dependency of neovim soon. Best regards Andreas [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fswatch [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270266 [3] https

Non-responsive maintainer check for dagostinelli

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Schneider
Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of fswatch [1]. fswatch will be a dependency of neovim 0.10 and I would like to get it updated to be prepared for the release. It looks like the maintainer is unresponsive. I've open the bugs [2] and [3]. [3] is the bug for this non-responsive maintainer

Non-responsive maintainer check for lcts

2024-01-05 Thread Lukáš Zaoral
Hello! Does anyone know how to contact @lcts, the maintainer of rear? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256943 I see no activity in dist-git, Koji or Bugzilla for more than a year. There is currently an urgent bug in rear which must be fixed. Otherwise, the tool is practically

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-05 Thread Sandro
a new maintainer and I don’t want to create polemics, I am here to hear and learn, but if I don’t participate in the discussion is more hard to learn. In any case, I apologize again if I was impolite. It's all good. This thread is regarding the non-responsive maintainer check [1]. It shouldn't

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-04 Thread Priscila Gutierres
I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a review in this thread. My point of view is that if the package is a dependency and no one is looking on it, it would be a priority to keep it up to date. I don’t know if merging it would be possible, since the maintainer is not

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-04 Thread Sandro
On 04-01-2024 23:05, Priscila Gutierres wrote: I bumped python-pebble to the latest version. Can someone please review this PR? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3 Reviewing the PR is not a problem. However, who would merge it, once approved? That needs a proven

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-04 Thread Priscila Gutierres
I bumped python-pebble to the latest version. Can someone please review this PR? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3 On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:05 PM Sandro wrote: > On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > > Does any package depend on python-pebble? > > I

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-02 Thread Priscila Gutierres
Thank you ! Em ter., 2 de jan. de 2024 às 17:05, Sandro escreveu: > On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > > Does any package depend on python-pebble? > > I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble > > You need to query for `python3-pebble`. > > $ dnf

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-02 Thread Sandro
On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote: Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble You need to query for `python3-pebble`. $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-02 Thread Priscila Gutierres
Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:56 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one > package, python-pebble, but it doesn't

Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-02 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi folks, Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one package, python-pebble, but it doesn't look like they've been active in a while. The package did not see to have been updated at all since the initial import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227456 and

Non-responsive maintainer check for Samuel P (survient)

2023-12-06 Thread Ondřej Holý
Hi, this email is part of the non-responsive maintainer policy for the wsdd package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253133 It would be nice to update the package to the latest upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175523 I proposed a pull request for it two months

Non-responsive maintainer check for David Howells (dhowells)

2023-11-12 Thread bbhtt
Hi, This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer policy for the keyutils [1] package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249374). The package is several versions out-of-date, 1.6.3 being the latest one, released in 2020. The last activity by the maintainer on the package

Non-responsive maintainer check for eneville

2023-10-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, Does anybody know if eneville is still contributing to Fedora and / or how to reach them? c.f. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246443 I see no activity in dist-git, bodhi, koji, or pagure.io in the last 365 days. Their packages seem to have been unmaintained for a while,

Bug 2246344 - Non-responsive maintainer check for hno

2023-10-26 Thread Michal Ambroz
Hello, Please anyone knows about any other channel to contact hno - Henrik Nordstrom ? I have not heard from him for like a year and I would like to take over the primary admin role for the radare2 package so the bugs get primarily assigned to me. This is part of the non-responsive

Re: Non-responsive maintainer Daiki Ueno

2023-09-20 Thread Daiki Ueno
Hello, Peter Oliver writes: > As per the non-responsive package maintainer process > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), > does anyone know how to contact Daiki Ueno? fedora-active-user isn’t > working for me at the moment, so I haven’t

Non-responsive maintainer Daiki Ueno

2023-09-20 Thread Peter Oliver
As per the non-responsive package maintainer process (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), does anyone know how to contact Daiki Ueno? fedora-active-user isn’t working for me at the moment, so I haven’t been able to check his activity

Re: Non-responsive maintainer mkulik

2023-09-13 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 13/09/23 11:58, Filip Janus ha scritto: > Hi all, > mkulik is the main admin of pg_auto_failover component, and I can't reach > him. So I would like to start the process of moving the main admin role to > me(I am an admin now but the default assignee is mkulik due to the main admin > role).

Non-responsive maintainer mkulik

2023-09-13 Thread Filip Janus
Hi all, mkulik is the main admin of pg_auto_failover component, and I can't reach him. So I would like to start the process of moving the main admin role to me(I am an admin now but the default assignee is mkulik due to the main admin role). Here is the mandatory BZ:

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Karsten Hopp (karsten)

2023-09-09 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 09/09/23 02:09, Valter Sage ha scritto: > Does anyone know how to contact Karsten Hopp (karsten)? This email is > part of the non-responsive maintainer process > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237962). > > The activity report at https://src.fedoraproject.o

Non-responsive maintainer check for Karsten Hopp (karsten)

2023-09-08 Thread Valter Sage
Does anyone know how to contact Karsten Hopp (karsten)? This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer process ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237962). The activity report at https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/karsten/ shows no activity in the past year, and fedora-active-user

Non-responsive maintainer check for juergh

2023-08-24 Thread Ondrej Mosnáček
Hello, Does anyone know how to contact juergh (Juerg Haefliger)? They are the sole maintainer of a single package in Fedora (cloud-utils), which hasn't seen any activity for almost 4 years. I've filed a non-responsive check bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234606 Here are

rpms/sslh non-responsive maintainer

2023-07-29 Thread Maxim Van Damme
Dear Devel list I was sent here from the Non-responsive maintainer policy. Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (aperezbios) for the package rpms/sslh. The following ticket was openend some time ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191660 Please let me know if you need

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Athos Ribeiro,(athoscr)

2023-07-17 Thread Ben Beasley
, at 3:51 PM, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:13:31PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: >>Does anyone know how to contact Athos Ribeiro (FAS: athoscr)? This >>email is part of the non-responsive maintainer process >>(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Athos Ribeiro,(athoscr)

2023-07-17 Thread Athos Ribeiro
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:13:31PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: Does anyone know how to contact Athos Ribeiro (FAS: athoscr)? This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer process (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223422). Hi Ben, Thanks for the contact :) I haven't been able

Non-responsive maintainer check for Athos Ribeiro,(athoscr)

2023-07-17 Thread Ben Beasley
Does anyone know how to contact Athos Ribeiro (FAS: athoscr)? This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer process (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223422). The following PR and bug/NEEDINFO have received no response in 7-9 months: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python

Re: non-responsive maintainer check for anthr76

2023-07-14 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
du Mark E. Fuller (mark.e.ful...@gmx.de) erabiltzaileak (2023 uzt. 14(a), or. (18:03)): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964 > > This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for > anthr76, following > https://docs.fedoraproje

non-responsive maintainer check for anthr76

2023-07-14 Thread Mark E. Fuller
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964 This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for anthr76, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want

[Bug 2219882] - Non-responsive maintainer check for jirka

2023-07-05 Thread reanima...@fedoraproject.org
Does anyone know how to reach jirka? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219882 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for @ilgrad

2023-07-03 Thread Ankur Sinha
FYI: also forwarded to the correct gmail address (I'd used org instead of com) On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 11:43:05 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Dear all, > > Would anyone know how to contact @ilgrad (Ilya Gradina)? They are one of > the original members of the neuro-sig packager group, but we've not >

Non responsive maintainer check for @ilgrad

2023-07-03 Thread Ankur Sinha
Dear all, Would anyone know how to contact @ilgrad (Ilya Gradina)? They are one of the original members of the neuro-sig packager group, but we've not heard from them in quite a while now. I've filed a non-responsive check bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219364 Here are

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - rkuska

2023-04-17 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 17/04/23 17:39, Jakub Kadlcik ha scritto: > Hello, > per the Non-responsive maintainer policy > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the > python-flas

Non-responsive maintainer - rkuska

2023-04-17 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
Hello, per the Non-responsive maintainer policy https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the python-flask-whooshee package but @rkuska can't give us permission because he lost access

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for jamatos

2023-03-23 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Monday, 13 March 2023 03.50.01 WET Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > This is a non-responsive maintainer check for jamatos (José Matos). Does > anyone know how to contact José? I am here and I will look into those issues. The end of the first semester fallback took a lot longer than I was exp

Non-responsive maintainer check for datamash

2023-03-18 Thread Georg Sauthoff
Hello, I've entered Bug 2179536 - Non-responsive maintainer check for datamash to see whether the maintainer is still interested in maintaining that package. Background: That package was almost retired, and in the last months of that retirement process the maintainer didn't respond to any

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

2023-03-16 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Bob! On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 07:34, Bob Mauchin wrote: > I'm here just very busy with work and being tired, I ll try to work on > stuff this weekend. It's a relief knowing you're okay. I have one bug in particular I'd like to draw your attention to:

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

2023-03-16 Thread Bob Mauchin
Fabio Valentini < > decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo. >>> I am trying to contact him as the ow

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

2023-03-15 Thread Mark E. Fuller
Thanks for the suggestion, but I do not use Twitter and don't want to create an account. On March 15, 2023 5:13:43 PM GMT+02:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: >On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller >wrote: >> >> Hi, >> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

2023-03-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > Hi, > This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo. > I am trying to contact him as the owner of > golang-github-masterminds-semver[0]. > There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 week

Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

2023-03-15 Thread Mark E. Fuller
Hi, This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo. I am trying to contact him as the owner of golang-github-masterminds-semver[0]. There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 weeks ago[1]. Does anyone know how to contact eclipseo? Thanks, fuller [0] https

Non-responsive maintainer check for jamatos

2023-03-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for jamatos (José Matos). Does anyone know how to contact José? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175015 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171739 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171428 https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Non-responsive maintainer check for avsej

2023-02-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for avsej (Sergey Avseyev). Does anyone know how to contact Sergey? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169250 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162893 https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Non-responsive maintainer check for andymenderunix

2023-02-02 Thread Scott Talbert
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for andymenderunix (Andy Mender). Does anyone know how to contact Andy? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166645 Thanks, Scott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for rmattes / update libQGLViewer to 2.9.1

2023-02-01 Thread Susi Lehtola
On 1/29/23 12:57, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Maybe slightly off-topic, but: > > This PR removes qt4 version libQGLViewer, which skyviewer depends on: > > $ dnf -q repoquery --repo=koji-38 --qf > '%{name}-%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}\t%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires > libQGLViewer >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for rmattes / update libQGLViewer to 2.9.1

2023-01-31 Thread Rich Mattes
On 1/29/23 5:57 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Susi Lehtola wrote on 2023/01/29 17:13: Hi, does anyone know how to contact Rich Mattes? They maintain libQGLViewer, which was last updated five years ago * Sun Aug 12 2018 Rich Mattes - 2.6.4-1 - Update to release 2.6.4, with upstream fix for

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for rmattes / update libQGLViewer to 2.9.1

2023-01-29 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Susi Lehtola wrote on 2023/01/29 17:13: Hi, does anyone know how to contact Rich Mattes? They maintain libQGLViewer, which was last updated five years ago * Sun Aug 12 2018 Rich Mattes - 2.6.4-1 - Update to release 2.6.4, with upstream fix for qreal on armv7 (rhbz#1556028) - Remove upstream

Non-responsive maintainer check for rmattes / update libQGLViewer to 2.9.1

2023-01-29 Thread Susi Lehtola
Hi, does anyone know how to contact Rich Mattes? They maintain libQGLViewer, which was last updated five years ago * Sun Aug 12 2018 Rich Mattes - 2.6.4-1 - Update to release 2.6.4, with upstream fix for qreal on armv7 (rhbz#1556028) - Remove upstream patch and update library names and there

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: mymindstorm

2023-01-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19/01/2023 17:00, Brendan Early wrote: Sorry for not responding to this earlier. I had changed the tickets to ASSIGNED in RHBZ to indicate that I am working on the problem with the package you are concerned about. I will have an update pushed this weekend. Great. Pull request with fix:

Non-responsive maintainer: mymindstorm

2023-01-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
Hello. According to non-responsive maintainer procedure, I'm asking if anyone knows how to contact mymindstorm? RHBZ issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162447 -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing

Non-responsive maintainer check for jhli

2023-01-10 Thread Ali Erdinc Koroglu
Hello everyone! Does anyone know how to contact Juston Li (jhli)? I have tried to reach out via email but have not received a response. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159807 -- Ali Erdinc Koroglu Linux OS Systems Engineering ___ devel

Non-responsive maintainer check for amatyuko

2023-01-09 Thread Ali Erdinc Koroglu
Hello everyone! Does anyone know how to contact Andrey Matyukov (amatyuko)? I have tried to reach out via email but have not received a response. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159390 -- Ali Erdinc Koroglu Linux OS Systems Engineering

Re: Non-responsive maintainer for lz4 package (pjp)

2022-12-12 Thread Smith, Stewart via devel
> On Dec 9, 2022, at 8:29 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I've started the non-responsive maintainer procedure for pjp > (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/pjp/) with > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152159 > > I currently have a

Non-responsive maintainer for lz4 package (pjp)

2022-12-09 Thread Timothée Ravier
Hey folks, I've started the non-responsive maintainer procedure for pjp (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/pjp/) with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152159 I currently have a pull request that has been blocked for 4 months now: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lz4/pull

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for jehane

2022-11-18 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 18/11/22 00:11, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: > Almost a year later we haven't any reply > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448 > > > Marianne not have any activity since Fev 2022 (expect in a > tag_package_owners entry!?!? ) > > Last login in FAS: > jehane 2021-02-18 > > Last

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for cottsay

2022-11-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:06:46AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > The package hackrf has several open bugs [1], [2]. > > I've started the non-responsive maintainer process by filing [3]. > > I've CC'd the maintainer on this email, but if anyone knows how else to > contact t

Non-responsive maintainer check for jehane

2022-11-17 Thread Sérgio Basto
Almost a year later we haven't any reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448 Marianne not have any activity since Fev 2022 (expect in a tag_package_owners entry!?!? ) Last login in FAS: jehane 2021-02-18 Last action on koji: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 tag_package_owners entry created

Non-responsive maintainer check for cottsay

2022-11-17 Thread Steven A. Falco
The package hackrf has several open bugs [1], [2]. I've started the non-responsive maintainer process by filing [3]. I've CC'd the maintainer on this email, but if anyone knows how else to contact them, please let me know. Thanks, Steve [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Non-responsive maintainer check for strobert

2022-11-14 Thread Robert Scheck
=2072993 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104397 I also filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142700 to follow the non-responsive maintainer policy. Regards, Robert pgpe2SLIIBchF.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing

Non-responsive maintainer check for guidograzioli

2022-11-08 Thread Richard Shaw
Looking here, I don't see any activity in the last year: https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/guidograzioli I have not gotten any response to BZs for yaml-cpp. Does anyone know how to contact them? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji - grads

2022-11-07 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 08/11/22 02:12, Orion Poplawski ha scritto: > Non-responsive maintainer check for deji > > Mainly for grads: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140875 > > But there is also an old bug for TexMaker: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208878

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji - grads

2022-11-07 Thread Jeffrey Stewart
Hello, I am interesting in maintaining this package(grads) if no one else will, but I require sponsorship since I am still new to this group. On 11/7/22 17:12, Orion Poplawski wrote: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji Mainly for grads: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id

Non-responsive maintainer check for deji - grads

2022-11-07 Thread Orion Poplawski
Non-responsive maintainer check for deji Mainly for grads: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140875 But there is also an old bug for TexMaker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088781 Has anyone else heard from Deji? Is anyone else interested in taking over grads

Non-responsive maintainer check for package ModemManager

2022-11-02 Thread Tao J
This is an accompanying mail for [0] in accordance with "Non-responsive maintainer policy" ModemManager[1] has some abrt issues [2][3][4][5] and also need a version bump[6][7] to support new hardware. A PR was sent about two months ago and no action from the maintainer. For the past

Non responsive maintainer check for ultrafredde

2022-10-30 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi folks, Would anyone know how to contact @ultrafredde please? A new contributor opened a PR to update the task package quite a while back, but there's been no response either on the PR or on the bug. @ultrafredde only maintains the one package, task. Here's the output of fedora-active-user:

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for volter

2022-10-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Scott Talbert wrote: > This is a non-responsive maintainer check for volter (Volker Fröhlich). > Does anyone know how to contact this user? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134665 Volker basically left Fedora packaging almost a year ago: https://lists.fedoraproject.

Non-responsive maintainer check for mikedep333

2022-10-13 Thread Scott Talbert
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for mikedep333 (Michael DePaulo). Does anyone know how to contact this maintainer? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134659 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Non-responsive maintainer check for ivazquez

2022-10-13 Thread Scott Talbert
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for ivazquez (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams). Does anyone know how to contact this user? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134660 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Non-responsive maintainer check for volter

2022-10-13 Thread Scott Talbert
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for volter (Volker Fröhlich). Does anyone know how to contact this user? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134665___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Non-responsive maintainer check for wolfy

2022-10-13 Thread Scott Talbert
This a non-responsive maintainer check for wolfy (manuel wolfshant). Does anyone know how to contact this maintainer? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134664 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

2022-09-25 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On 9/22/22 01:10, Maxwell G wrote: On Fri Sep 2, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote: Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini : Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora packages? I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I reached out to

Non-responsive maintainer check for Othman Madjoudj a.k.a. athmane

2022-09-24 Thread PGNet Dev
Does anyone know how to contact Othman Madjoudj a.k.a. athmane? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129515 Bug List, pkg libmodsecurity ID Status ResolSummary Changed 2129515 NEW Non-responsive

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

2022-09-21 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On Fri Sep 2, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini : > > > Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora > > packages? > I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I > reached out to them about moby-engine and

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for golang-github-prometheus-common-devel

2022-09-18 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
18. syyskuuta 2022 13.31.24 GMT+03:00 zebo...@gmail.com kirjoitti: > >I haven't seen fpokorny active even when I started working on Go >packages. Is there a way to reallocate all is Go packages to either the >go-sig group or myself? According to policy, they cannot be allocated to the SIG: "SIGs

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for golang-github-prometheus-common-devel

2022-09-18 Thread zebob . m
lowing your guide lines (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), I opend Non-responsive maintainer check f a for this package For the record, the maintainer is fpokorny. Indeed, it seems that maintainer is unresponsive. They haven't had any

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for golang-github-prometheus-common-devel

2022-09-16 Thread Maxwell G via devel
aproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), > I opend Non-responsive maintainer check f a for this package For the record, the maintainer is fpokorny. Indeed, it seems that maintainer is unresponsive. They haven't had any recent activity in distgit. Other Go SIG me

Non-responsive maintainer check for golang-github-prometheus-common-devel

2022-09-16 Thread Tobias Zellner
Hello all, some weeks ago I opened the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109630 Since there is no response to this bug, and following your guide lines (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), I opend Non-responsive maintainer

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Michal Ambroz a.k.a. rebus

2022-09-08 Thread Michal Ambroz
Hi Andy, I am here. Michal Ambroz -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Mattia Verga via devel Komu: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Kopie: Mattia Verga Datum: 24. 8. 2022 7:46:54 Předmět: Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Michal Ambroz a.k.a. rebus " Il 23/08/22 22:36, zonexpertco

[Bug 2120834] Non-responsive maintainer check for rebus

2022-09-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120834 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

2022-09-02 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On Friday, September 2, 2022 Dusty Mabe wrote: > > Side note: I have asked for co-maintainers for those packages a couple > > times, but so far, I have not found any. Perhaps one of the CoreOS people > > would be interested? It seems those packages are used a lot there based > > on the bug reports

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

2022-09-02 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 9/2/22 10:20, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini : > >> Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora >> packages? > I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I > reached out to them about moby-engine and

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

2022-09-02 Thread Maxwell G via devel
Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini : Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora packages? I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I reached out to them about moby-engine and containerd at the end of May, and they said they no longer

Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

2022-09-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, This is the "Week 0" email to the devel list according to the "Non-responsive maintainer policy" for "olem" / Olivier Lemasle. Non-responsive maintainer bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123691 Their packages are in various states of disr

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Michal Ambroz a.k.a. rebus

2022-08-23 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
bug.cgi?id=2115572 > > Thanks, > Andy Accordingly to src.fp.o stats they are active: https://src.fedoraproject.org/api/0/user/rebus/activity/stats It's August, so people could be on vacation... the relevant bug was opened on 4th August, so a non-responsive maintainer ticket

Non-responsive maintainer check for Michal Ambroz a.k.a. rebus

2022-08-23 Thread zonexpertconsulting
Does anyone know how to contact Michal Ambroz a.k.a. rebus? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120834 This is blocking the ZoneMinder package in RPMFusion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572 Thanks, Andy ___ devel mailing

[Bug 2120834] Non-responsive maintainer check for rebus

2022-08-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120834 Andrew Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lys...@gmail.com|re...@seznam.cz Doc Type|---

[Bug 2120834] New: Non-responsive maintainer check for rebus

2022-08-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120834 Bug ID: 2120834 Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for rebus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Igor Raits (ignatenkobrain)

2022-08-12 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:12 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > (snip) > rust-abomonation: sole maintainer (with @rust-sig); CVE bug ignored for > eight months: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039788 > > rust-brotli-sys: primary maintainer; CVE bug ignored for eight months: >

Non-responsive maintainer check for Igor Raits (ignatenkobrain)

2022-08-12 Thread Ben Beasley
I have opened a bug on python-parameterized, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117916, initiating a non-responsive maintainer check for Igor Raits, FAS ignatenkobrain. Does anybody know how to contact Igor, or whether they are still actively maintaining Fedora packages? I have sent

Non-responsive maintainer check for dbruno

2022-08-08 Thread Robby Callicotte via devel
Hello, Per the unresponsive package maintainer policy, I am checking if anyone has a way to contact Daniel Bruno , fas ID: dbruno. Bugzilla link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116543 # Fedora Active User data: # Last action on koji: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 tag_package_owners entry

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for hguemar

2022-08-08 Thread Haïkel
Hi, send me your FAS account and I'll transfer ownership to you of pyperclip. You're welcome to contact me directly through email (I'm currently in sick leave but I'll browse email from time to time). Regards, H. ___ devel mailing list --

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >