On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 16:36:05 +0100,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
As discussed, this list isn't quite correct, but it's the best
I've got at the moment.
We need to rebuild kdeedu too, it links statically against ocaml-facile.
(And ocaml-facile
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:28:41PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the full package list is
below:
I rebuilt the following members of this list today:
As discussed, this list isn't quite correct, but it's the best
I've got at the moment.
I following are DONE:
ocaml-4.00.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-9.fc18.src.rpm
ocaml-augeas-0.5-2.fc18.src.rpm
ocaml-bin-prot-2.0.9-2.fc18.src.rpm
ocaml-bisect-1.1-3.fc18.src.rpm
On 12/14/2012 06:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
FTBFS:
plplot-5.9.9-10.svn12202.fc18.src.rpm
I'll take a look in a bit.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:25:40PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
None of the Unison* packages.
why
Now I've done these too, so that's all the packages that I'm aware of.
The mega-update is:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20337
It's marked as [CRITPATH] for some
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:25:40PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
None of the Unison* packages.
why
Now I've done these too, so that's all the packages that I'm aware of.
The mega-update is:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's my understanding that when the update goes out, the build
overrides are automatically expired, which is why I selected a very
long expiry.
AIUI, that's actually not the case. But you can expire the stuff manually
when it's done.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
As discussed, this list isn't quite correct, but it's the best
I've got at the moment.
We need to rebuild kdeedu too, it links statically against ocaml-facile.
(And ocaml-facile needs to be in the buildroot overrides for that.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
Kevin Kofler wrote:
We need to rebuild kdeedu too, it links statically against ocaml-facile.
(And ocaml-facile needs to be in the buildroot overrides for that.)
Oops, actually, make that kalzium. kdeedu is now a metapackage, the apps are
built separately.
I'll take care of it.
Kevin
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:36:05PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
As discussed, this list isn't quite correct, but it's the best
I've got at the moment.
We need to rebuild kdeedu too, it links statically against ocaml-facile.
(And ocaml-facile needs to be in the
On 12/14/2012 07:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's my understanding that when the update goes out, the build
overrides are automatically expired, which is why I selected a very
long expiry.
AIUI, that's actually not the case. But you can expire the stuff manually
On 12/14/2012 11:12 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 12/14/2012 07:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's my understanding that when the update goes out, the build
overrides are automatically expired, which is why I selected a very
long expiry.
AIUI, that's actually not the case.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
All those packages should be in the buildroot overrides, unless I
missed any.
Strangely, the command at the end of this email shows only 67
overrides, which can't be right because there are more packages than
that.
Yet:
bodhi
Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which already went into
OCaml 4.00.1 upstream some months ago fixes this. However it requires
that every OCaml package be rebuilt in Fedora 18 (since
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:16:12 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which already went into
OCaml 4.00.1 upstream some months ago
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:20:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:16:12 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
It seems likely (comment 20) that a
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-findlib-1.3.3-3.fc18,ocaml-4.00.1-1.fc18
(that link will probably go stale unfortunately ...)
Indeed. For now it is:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
There will probably be about 70-80 packages in all. I'm planning
to do the others tomorrow.
Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the full package list is
below:
$ repoquery -s --alldeps --recursive --whatrequires ocaml
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:38:26 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
There will probably be about 70-80 packages in all. I'm planning
to do the others tomorrow.
Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 16:16 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which already went into
OCaml 4.00.1 upstream some months ago fixes this. However it
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:50:21PM +0200, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:38:26 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
There will probably be about 70-80 packages in all. I'm planning
to do the
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 01:58:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 16:16 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which already
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 22:03 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I don't think any of the packages are going to be an issue. None of
them are critical path packages or anything especially important,
except possible llvm.
Also xen. We have a release criterion relating to it. Maybe not critpath
by
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:43:23PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 22:03 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I don't think any of the packages are going to be an issue. None of
them are critical path packages or anything especially important,
except possible llvm.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the full package list is
below:
I rebuilt the following members of this list today:
alt-ergo-0.94-6.fc18.src.rpm
apron-0.9.10-8.fc18.src.rpm
coq-8.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
25 matches
Mail list logo
